Avokati Genc Gjokutaj, ka komentuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e SPAK p\u00ebr pushimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes ndaj gjyqtares s\u00eb GJKKO, Irena Gjoka, n\u00eb lidhje me d\u00ebnimin dhe d\u00ebbimin e saj n\u00eb Greqi, si dhe mosdeklarimin e k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave n\u00eb formular\u00ebt zyrtar\u00eb.<\/p>\n
I ftuar n\u00eb Syri TV, Gjokutaj e cil\u00ebsoi vendimin e SPAK si absurditet juridik nd\u00ebrsa shtoi se sipas tij, ka prapavij\u00eb politike.<\/p>\n
Sipas Gjokutajt, vendimi i SPAK nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht nj\u00eb akt procedural, por nj\u00eb \u201cvend ngjarje\u201d, duke e interpretuar si nj\u00eb shp\u00ebrblim ndaj gjyqtares p\u00ebr parregullsit\u00eb e kryera gjat\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb detyr\u00ebs. Ai theksoi se \u00e7\u00ebshtja pritet t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb p\u00ebr shqyrtim n\u00eb GJKKO, duke ngritur pik\u00ebpyetje mbi konfliktin e mundsh\u00ebm t\u00eb interesit, pasi nj\u00eb gjyqtare e k\u00ebsaj gjykate do t\u00eb gjykohej nga koleg\u00eb t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs struktur\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Gjokutaj u ndal edhe te aspekti ligjor, duke p\u00ebrmendur nenin 75 t\u00eb Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale dhe nenin 135 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, q\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb kompetencat p\u00ebr hetimin dhe gjykimin e zyrtar\u00ebve t\u00eb lart\u00eb. Sipas tij, rasti n\u00eb fjal\u00eb nuk hyn n\u00eb juridiksionin e GJKKO-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cKjo ngjarje e djeshme, se n\u00eb fakt kjo nuk \u00ebsht ky s\u2019\u00ebsht\u00eb vendim prokurorie, ky \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebrtet vend ngjarje. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb shp\u00ebrblimi q\u00eb i ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb Irena Gjok\u00ebs p\u00ebr gjith\u00eb ato parregullsit\u00eb q\u00eb ka b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pozicion q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe q\u00eb me gjas\u00eb do t\u00eb vazhdoj\u00eb t\u00eb jet\u00eb. N\u00eb fakt ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim i SPAK-ut i cili do t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb n\u00eb GJKKO. Dhe ky \u00ebsht\u00eb problemi i par\u00eb q\u00eb kemi sepse, n\u00eb parimin e p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm, neni 75 i Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale e thot\u00eb qart\u00eb q\u00eb kompetenca p\u00ebr procedimin e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve.\u00a0 Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht \u00ebsht\u00eb e kund\u00ebrligjshme q\u00eb nj\u00eb gjyqtar i GJKKO-s\u00eb t\u00eb gjykohet nga e nj\u00ebjta gjykat nga nj\u00eb kolege e saj. Dhe kjo lidhet neni i Kodit t\u00eb Procedur\u00ebs Penale lidhet edhe me nenin 135 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, i cili n\u00eb pik\u00ebn dy tregon rrethin e\u00a0\u00e7\u00ebshtjeve q\u00eb heton edhe gjykon, Gjykata e Posa\u00e7me dhe SPAK-u. Pra, korrupsioni i lart\u00eb i zyrtar\u00ebve dhe ky procedim penal, i ashtuquajturi procedim, ta shpjegoj arsyet. Ky procedim penal nuk hyn n\u00eb rrethin e atyre \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve, q\u00eb gjykon GJKKO-ja. N\u00eb fakt k\u00ebtu ka dhe nj\u00eb defekt t\u00eb ligjit sepse,\u00a0nj\u00eb nga zgjidhjet do t\u00eb ishte delegimi. Delegimi i gjyqtar\u00ebve t\u00eb juridiksionit t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr llogari,\u00a0 t\u00eb GJKKO-s \u00a0apo, po edhe kjo do t\u00eb quhej pjes\u00eb e GJKKO-s\u00eb. N\u00eb fakt, n\u00eb kuptimin formal, procedural t\u00eb fjal\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Por nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ky problemi kryesor, problemi kryesor \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb po t\u2019i hysh,\u00a0 vendimit t\u00eb t \u00a0t\u00eb SPAK-ut, i cili pritet t\u00eb shortohet, shorti i ka r\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb gjyqtare Emanuela Osmani. Dhe po t\u2019i hysh thelbit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi, n\u00eb fakt q\u00eb n\u00eb krye t\u00eb her\u00ebs, n\u00eb studion t\u00ebnde e kemi th\u00ebn\u00eb q \u00a0un\u00eb e kam th\u00ebn\u00eb her\u00ebt q\u00eb jo m\u00eb kot kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb regjistruar pa em\u00ebr, si \u00e7\u00ebshtje. Dhe Irena Gjoka nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb asnj\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb cil\u00ebsi, si person n\u00ebn hetim. Dhe k\u00ebtu po t\u00eb shikosh, ka, ka nj\u00eb vendim por ka dy q\u00ebndrime. Nj\u00ebher\u00eb thuhet, provohet ekzistenca e faktit penal, pra, d\u00ebbimi, edhe vendimi i gjykat\u00ebs sepse nuk ja, i ka mbetur SPAK-ut ta provoj \u00a0po e ka provuar Prokurori i P\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm me shkres\u00ebn q\u00eb i ka d\u00ebrguar KLGJ-s\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Pra, ekziston fakti penal, \u00a0\u00a0por n\u00eb fund thot\u00eb prokurori, \u00a0\u00a0nuk provohet q\u00eb ta ket\u00eb kryer thot \u00a0k\u00ebt\u00eb fakt penal ta ket\u00eb konsumuar Irena Gjoka. Se kush tjet\u00ebr un\u00eb nuk di t\u00eb them, p\u00ebrve\u00e7 Irena Gjok\u00ebs, sepse k\u00ebtu nuk flitet p\u00ebr dyshim t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs. Dhe ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb jo profesionale dhe q\u00eb tregon profilin politik t\u00eb k\u00ebtij prokurori, po si\u00e7 duket edhe t\u00eb SPAK-ut i cili, ndon\u00ebse ka p\u00ebrdorur k\u00ebmb\u00ebn e majt \u00a0deri tash ka filluar t\u00eb luaj\u00eb me t\u00eb dyja k\u00ebmb\u00ebt. Historia paraqitet, po t\u00eb shikosh vendimin, ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim, thash\u00eb me nj\u00eb profil politik, pasi, pasi, si pasoj\u00eb e k\u00ebtij vendimi, duke th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb nuk provohet kjo, kjo vep\u00ebr penale t\u00eb kryer Irena Gjoka. Ky vendim me shum\u00eb gjas\u00eb mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret nga ILD-ja.<\/p>\n
Provohet fakti penal, se nuk ka mbetur ta provoj\u00eb ky Maksuti. E ka provuar tjet\u00ebrkush at\u00eb. Dhe prokurori tashti ngat\u00ebrron, ngat\u00ebrron me dashje, njohjen e vendimit grek, se ky gjykon tashti procedur\u00ebn e Greqis\u00eb\u00a0me deklarimin e Irena Gjok\u00ebs n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri. Po. Deklarimi n\u00eb formular nuk lidhet domosdoshm\u00ebrisht me ekzistenc\u00ebn apo jo t\u00eb qenies s\u00eb vendimit n\u00eb fuqi, apo \u00ebsht\u00eb parashkruar, apo e t\u00eb tjera e t\u00eb tjera. Ajo ka nj\u00eb\u00a0kuptim tjet\u00ebr. Ti duhet t\u00eb deklarosh \u00e7far\u00eb ka ndodhur me ty, q\u00eb ti kandidon dhe ke qen\u00eb i d\u00ebnuar. Nuk mbytesh k\u00ebtu, t\u00eb marr\u00ebsh d\u00ebshmin\u00eb e penalitetit t\u00eb bardh por, sigurisht, p\u00ebr gjyqtar\u00ebt dhe prokuror\u00ebt e posa\u00e7\u00ebm ka nj\u00eb hetim t\u00eb thelluar, n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin po t\u00eb shikosh pyet\u00ebsorin,\u00a0flitet deri dhe p\u00ebr nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebrim t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb stacion policie. Pra, k\u00ebto kritere jan\u00eb vendosur p\u00ebr t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb filt\u00ebr shum\u00eb t\u00eb im\u00ebt, i cili nuk lidhet me quhet apo s\u2019quhet vendimi sot i Irena Gjok\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e turpshme, dhe vet\u00ebm prokuror\u00eb sh\u00ebrb\u00ebtor\u00eb t\u00eb Ram\u00ebs mund t\u2019i b\u00ebjn\u00a0mund t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb interpretime t\u00eb tilla. Kjo nuk \u00ebsht sepse ky prokuror t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn duhet t\u00eb kishte, duhet t\u00eb kishte p\u00ebrmendur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim q\u00eb po, kjo vep\u00ebr penale \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer nga gjyqtari Irena Gjoka, por ne nuk mund ta ndjekim p\u00ebr arsye se afatet tashm\u00eb nuk mund ta ndjekim \u00e7\u00ebshtjen penale, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb skadimit t\u00eb afatit t\u00eb hetimit.\u00a0kall\u00ebzimi \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nga\u00a0Adriana Kalaja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb konsumuar afati p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin flet ky, po kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje teknike.<\/p>\n
Pra, t\u2019i vinte emri \u00e7\u00ebshtjes dhe le ta pushonte. Ekzistenca e faktit q\u00eb ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebnuar n\u00eb Greqi, pavar\u00ebsisht qenies s\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb ekzekutuesh\u00ebm apo jo, parashkruar apo jo, por vendim p\u00ebrfundimtar sigurisht, at\u00eb e p\u00ebrjashton nga qenia si, si, si magjistrate. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb shqet\u00ebsuese sepse un\u00eb thash ky vendim do t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret, do t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret nga nj\u00eb maksut tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb ILD, e kupton? P\u00ebr t\u2019i dh\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb drejtim q\u00eb t\u00eb thot\u00eb p\u00ebrderisa s\u2019provohet q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kryer nga Irena Gjoka thot kjo vep\u00ebr, se kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7udia m\u00eb e madhe. Shiko, k\u00ebta, k\u00ebta o jan\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00a0ose jan\u00eb t\u00eb kapur deri n\u00eb asfiksi. Sepse t\u00eb thuash q\u00eb nuk provohet ta ket\u00eb kryer Irena Gjoka, po mir\u00eb po kush, kush e ka kryer k\u00ebt\u00eb? Kush ka vajtur n\u00eb dogan\u00eb n\u00eb Greqi p\u00ebr t\u00eb hyr\u00eb n\u00eb Greqi? Dhe tjetra, ai pranon d\u00ebbimin. Pranon d\u00ebbimin n\u00eb vendim dhe thot\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb ankuar thot\u00a0nga gjyqtarja.\u00a0 Dhe d\u00ebbimi pas sjell \u00e7\u00ebshtje penale patjet\u00ebr sepse ai ishte nj\u00eb falsifikim. \u00cbsht\u00eb e bashk\u00eblidhur \u00e7\u00ebshtja, pavar\u00ebsisht p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb objekteve, jan\u00eb procedime t\u00eb ndara, po ajo pas sjell. K\u00ebshtu q\u00eb ajo ka qen\u00eb jo n\u00eb dijeni, po m\u00eb n\u00eb dijeni se gjith\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt\u201d,\u00a0\u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur Gjokutaj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Avokati Genc Gjokutaj, ka komentuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e SPAK p\u00ebr pushimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes ndaj gjyqtares s\u00eb GJKKO, Irena Gjoka, n\u00eb lidhje me d\u00ebnimin dhe d\u00ebbimin e saj n\u00eb Greqi, si dhe mosdeklarimin e k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave n\u00eb formular\u00ebt zyrtar\u00eb. I ftuar n\u00eb Syri TV, Gjokutaj e cil\u00ebsoi vendimin e SPAK si absurditet juridik nd\u00ebrsa shtoi se …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":138866,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138945"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138945\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":138947,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138945\/revisions\/138947"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/138866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}