{"id":146727,"date":"2026-06-26T09:29:43","date_gmt":"2026-06-26T09:29:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/?p=146727"},"modified":"2026-06-26T09:29:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T09:29:43","slug":"rama-ligj-per-shitjen-e-tokes-shteterore-te-te-huajt-alarmi-i-ekspertes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/2026\/06\/26\/rama-ligj-per-shitjen-e-tokes-shteterore-te-te-huajt-alarmi-i-ekspertes\/","title":{"rendered":"Rama, ligj p\u00ebr shitjen e tok\u00ebs shtet\u00ebrore te t\u00eb huajt, alarmi i ekspertes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nga Irena DULE<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb Qeveri e shum\u00eb shpejt n\u00eb Kuvend \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim nj\u00eb projektligj p\u00ebr shitjen e tok\u00ebs bujq\u00ebsore shtet\u00ebrore personave t\u00eb huaj. Problemi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ideja n\u00eb vetvete, por m\u00ebnyra si \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar, nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm q\u00eb krijon regjim paralel, privilegjon t\u00eb huajt mbi vend\u0430sit, dhe mund\u00ebson privatizim toke q\u00eb e shet si “investim i huaj.”<\/p>\n

Shqip\u00ebria ka nd\u00ebrtuar me kalimin e viteve nj\u00eb model t\u00eb njohur ligj(sh)b\u00ebrjeje (nuk po rendis shembuj se t\u00eb till\u00eb ka plot dhe nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo tema). Kur d\u00ebshiron t\u00eb arrij\u00eb nj\u00eb rezultat q\u00eb e drejta ekzistuese nuk e lejon ose e lejon por me kufizime t\u00eb pap\u00eblqyera nuk ndryshohet ligji ekzistues. Krijohet nj\u00eb ligj i ri paralel.<\/p>\n

Ai shfuqizon vet\u00ebm ato dispozita t\u00eb ligjit t\u00eb vjet\u00ebr q\u00eb pengojn\u00eb, ruan ato q\u00eb i japin pamjen e mbrojtjes, dhe krijon regjim t\u00eb ri me dukje rregullimi por me efekt liberalizimi selektiv. Projektligji p\u00ebr kalimin e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb s\u00eb tok\u00ebs bujq\u00ebsore tek personat e huaj \u00ebsht\u00eb shembull klasik i k\u00ebtij modeli dhe i radh\u00ebs, megjitaht\u00eb jo nd\u00ebr m\u00eb t\u00eb sofistikuarit.<\/p>\n

Testi i thjesht\u00eb q\u00eb e zbulon gjith\u00e7ka \u00ebsht\u00eb ky. N\u00ebse q\u00ebllimi i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb i k\u00ebtij projektligji ishte mosdiskriminimi i personave t\u00eb huaj si\u00e7 pretendon neni 1, zgjidhja juridike minimale dhe korrekte do t\u00eb ishte nj\u00eb nen i vet\u00ebm. Shfuqizim i nenit 4 t\u00eb Ligjit nr. 8337\/1998, P\u00ebr shitblerjen e tokave bujq\u00ebsore\u2026(ekzistues e n\u00eb fuqi), i cili i p\u00ebrjashton t\u00eb huajt nga regjimi i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm, dhe l\u00ebri ata t\u00eb trajtohen nj\u00eblloj si shtetasit shqiptar\u00eb, me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat kufizime, t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat procedura, t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat t\u00eb drejta. Kaq. Nj\u00eb nen. Nj\u00eb faqe. Jo dymb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb nene, jo ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm, jo regjim paralel.<\/p>\n

Fakti q\u00eb u zgjodh rruga e kund\u00ebrt e zbulon axhend\u00ebn. Ligji i posa\u00e7\u00ebm vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr personat e huaj nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb instrument mosdiskriminimi, \u00ebsht\u00eb instrument trajtimi t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb. Dhe trajtimi i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb, sipas nenit 18 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, k\u00ebrkon justifikim objektiv dhe proporcional. Ky ligj nuk ofron asnj\u00eb justifikim t\u00eb till\u00eb, sepse nuk ka. Asimetria e krijuar \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb: neni 3 i Ligjit 8337\/1998, i cili e lidh blerjen e tok\u00ebs bujq\u00ebsore shtet\u00ebrore me p\u00ebrfundimin e procesit t\u00eb kompensimit t\u00eb ish-pronar\u00ebve, mbetet n\u00eb fuqi p\u00ebr shqiptar\u00ebt. P\u00ebr t\u00eb huajt, drafti hap kanal t\u00eb ri paralel. Shqiptari pret radh\u00ebn e kompensimit. I huaji nuk pret.<\/p>\n

Kjo asimetri nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb defekt teknik i draftimit, por \u00ebsht\u00eb rezultati i synuar. Por ka edhe nj\u00eb problem m\u00eb thelb\u00ebsor q\u00eb drafti mundohet ta maskoj\u00eb me em\u00ebrtim. Ajo q\u00eb ligji e quan “kalim pron\u00ebsie” \u00ebsht\u00eb, juridikisht dhe substancialisht, privatizim i tok\u00ebs bujq\u00ebsore shtet\u00ebrore. Toka \u00ebsht\u00eb shtet\u00ebrore, kalon nga shteti tek subjekti privat, me akt noterial, kundrejt \u00e7mimi, p\u00ebrgjithmon\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Neni 3 i Ligjit 8337 e ndaloi pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebt\u00eb, jo rast\u00ebsisht, por sepse procesi i kompensimit t\u00eb ish-pronar\u00ebve nuk kishte p\u00ebrfunduar dhe toka shtet\u00ebrore mbetej e ekspozuar ndaj pretendimeve t\u00eb tyre. Drafti i ri nuk e zgjidh k\u00ebt\u00eb problem juridik themelor, as kompensimin nuk e p\u00ebrfundoi, as pretendimet e ish-pronar\u00ebve nuk i adreson. Thjesht krijon kanal an\u00ebsor q\u00eb e anashkalon nenin 3 p\u00ebr nj\u00eb kategori bler\u00ebsish. Privatizimi i shmangur nga procedura e rregullt, i riem\u00ebrtuar si “investim i huaj”.<\/p>\n

P\u00ebr t’i dh\u00ebn\u00eb gjith\u00eb k\u00ebsaj pamjen e ligjit t\u00eb kujdessh\u00ebm, nenet 5,6 dhe 7 vendosin nj\u00eb raft t\u00eb t\u00ebr\u00eb kushtesh dhe detyrimi. Parakushtet para blerjes jan\u00eb problematike kur bien pas fitimit t\u00eb pron\u00ebsis\u00eb. P\u00ebrdorim ekskluziv bujq\u00ebsor, mosndryshim destinacioni, aktivitet real i dokumentuar, dhe mbi t\u00eb gjitha revokimi i pron\u00ebsis\u00eb si sanksion p\u00ebr mosrespektim.<\/p>\n

Ligji mund ta kufizoj\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimin e pron\u00ebs, por nuk mund t\u2019ia rimarr\u00eb pron\u00ebn bler\u00ebsit pa nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb t\u00eb qart\u00eb, arsye t\u00eb fort\u00eb, proporcionalitet dhe kompensim. Drafti p\u00ebrdor termin \u201crevokim i pron\u00ebsis\u00eb\u201d, por nuk shpjegon as si b\u00ebhet, as kush e vendos, as \u00e7far\u00eb ndodh me parat\u00eb e paguara. Kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb garanci juridike, por nj\u00eb dispozit\u00eb e paqart\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb rr\u00ebzohet leht\u00ebsisht n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb.<\/p>\n

Pron\u00ebsia e fituar plot\u00ebsisht nuk mund t\u00eb kufizohet pas transferimit, n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet detyrimi ligjor t\u00eb nj\u00ebansh\u00ebm pa kompensim, kjo bie ndesh me nenin 41 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs dhe Protokollin 1 t\u00eb KEDNJ. Cdo ekspert ligjor e kupton q\u00eb kufizimi i mos-tjet\u00ebrsimit dhe revokimi ekzistojn\u00eb vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr t\u00eb hedhur hi syve, p\u00ebr t’i th\u00ebn\u00eb opinionit publik “ja, ne vendos\u00ebm garanci”, nd\u00ebrsa investitori i huaj e di mir\u00eb q\u00eb k\u00ebto nuk do t’i rezistojn\u00eb dot nj\u00eb sfide gjyq\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n

Tabela e krahasimit me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn evropiane e mbyll \u00e7\u00ebshtjen. Asnj\u00eb shtet an\u00ebtar i BE nuk ka krijuar ligj t\u00eb posa\u00e7\u00ebm q\u00eb u jep t\u00eb huajve m\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb drejta mbi tok\u00ebn shtet\u00ebrore sesa vendasve. Ky draft nuk ka precedent evropian, jo e jo por as n\u00eb ballkan dhe jo sepse \u00ebsht\u00eb inovativ, por sepse \u00ebsht\u00eb i palogjiksh\u00ebm si instrument i politik\u00ebs ligjore.<\/p>\n

Ajo q\u00eb mbetet pas analiz\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb portret i ligjb\u00ebrjes inkompetente.<\/p>\n

Inkompetenca e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb prodhon ligje kaotike pa drejtim. Ky ligj ka drejtim shum\u00eb t\u00eb qart\u00eb. Ai shmang procedur\u00ebn e privatizimit, anashkalon kufizimet e kompensimit, privilegjon bler\u00ebsin e huaj, mbulon gjith\u00e7ka me retorik\u00eb investimi. Diletantizmi \u00ebsht\u00eb fasada. Q\u00ebllimi \u00ebsht\u00eb substanca.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nga Irena DULE N\u00eb Qeveri e shum\u00eb shpejt n\u00eb Kuvend \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb shqyrtim nj\u00eb projektligj p\u00ebr shitjen e tok\u00ebs bujq\u00ebsore shtet\u00ebrore personave t\u00eb huaj. Problemi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ideja n\u00eb vetvete, por m\u00ebnyra si \u00ebsht\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuar, nj\u00eb ligj i posa\u00e7\u00ebm q\u00eb krijon regjim paralel, privilegjon t\u00eb huajt mbi vend\u0430sit, dhe mund\u00ebson privatizim toke q\u00eb e shet …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":146728,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146727"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146727\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":146729,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146727\/revisions\/146729"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/146728"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}