SELENICA, BASHKI M\u00cb VETE!<\/p>\n
Pasi u njoha me projektin e ri t\u00eb reform\u00ebs administrativo-territoriale, po paraqes argumentet e mia lidhur me kund\u00ebrshtimin e ides\u00eb s\u00eb bashkimit t\u00eb bashkis\u00eb s\u00eb Selenic\u00ebs me at\u00eb t\u00eb Vlor\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Mendimi im \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb duhet d\u00ebgjuar z\u00ebri i ekspert\u00ebve, por mbi t\u00eb gjitha z\u00ebri dhe interesi i qytetar\u00ebve.<\/p>\n
Gjat\u00eb diskutimeve p\u00ebr buxhetin e shtetit, q\u00ebndrimi im ka q\u00ebn\u00eb se, ndarja e buxhetit t\u00eb shtetit mes qeverisjes qendrore dhe pushtetit vendor \u00ebsht\u00eb e padrejt\u00eb. Rreth 90% e buxhetit administrohet nga qeveria qendrore, nd\u00ebrsa vet\u00ebm 10% u shkon 61 bashkive t\u00eb vendit.<\/p>\n
Kam bindjen se transfertat e pakusht\u00ebzuara q\u00eb marrin bashkit\u00eb nga buxheti i shtetit jan\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebta. N\u00ebse do t\u00eb b\u00ebnim nj\u00eb ndarje t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb buxhetit t\u00eb shtetit duke shtuar buxhetin p\u00ebr qeverisjen vendore, nuk do t\u00eb kishim nevoj\u00eb t\u00eb zvog\u00eblojm\u00eb numrin e bashkive, por t\u00eb rrisim financimin e tyre, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr investime n\u00eb infrastruktur\u00eb, duke mb\u00ebshtetur bashkit\u00eb q\u00eb kan\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb nevoj\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Raporti p\u00ebrfundimtar \u201cReforma Administrativo-Territoriale 2.0\u201d nxjerr n\u00eb pah vet\u00eb treguesit pozitiv\u00eb t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Selenic\u00eb:<\/p>\n
1.Funksionaliteti si bashki<\/p>\n
Selenica renditet e 29-ta n\u00eb rang komb\u00ebtar, me nj\u00eb IFB (Indeks t\u00eb Funksionalitetit t\u00eb Bashkive) prej 57.3.<\/p>\n
2.Performanca ekonomike<\/p>\n
Edhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb tregues renditet e 29-ta n\u00eb vend, me nj\u00eb IPE (Indeks t\u00eb Performanc\u00ebs Ekonomike) prej 42.2, mbi mesataren komb\u00ebtare.<\/p>\n
Paga mesatare \u00ebsht\u00eb 58.386 lek\u00eb, pothuajse n\u00eb nivelin e mesatares komb\u00ebtare dhe m\u00eb e lart\u00eb se n\u00eb shum\u00eb bashki t\u00eb ngjashme p\u00ebr nga madh\u00ebsia.<\/p>\n
Detyrimet e prapambetura jan\u00eb vet\u00ebm 3.6%, nj\u00eb tregues m\u00eb i mir\u00eb se mesatarja komb\u00ebtare.<\/p>\n
3.Indeksi i Mas\u00ebs Urbane (IMU)<\/p>\n
I vetmi tregues q\u00eb mund ta penalizoj\u00eb Selenic\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb IMU-ja, p\u00ebr shkak se popullsia \u00ebsht\u00eb e shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb n\u00eb shum\u00eb fshatra dhe jo e p\u00ebrqendruar n\u00eb nj\u00eb qend\u00ebr urbane.<\/p>\n
Por, pik\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Selenica duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb bashki, ndryshe do t\u2019i largonte edhe m\u00eb shum\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimet nga qytetar\u00ebt.<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse do t\u00eb ndiqej logjika e funksionalitetit dhe performanc\u00ebs ekonomike, at\u00ebher\u00eb edhe disa bashki t\u00eb tjera, t\u00eb cilat renditen m\u00eb posht\u00eb se Selenica, do t\u00eb duhej t\u00eb mos quheshin m\u00eb bashki. Por kjo nuk po ndodh.<\/p>\n
Komisioni pretendon se treguesit ekonomik\u00eb t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Selenic\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebt, duke u mb\u00ebshtetur te numri i bizneseve.<\/p>\n
Po si ka mund\u00ebsi q\u00eb an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e Komisionit kan\u00eb harruar se Selenica ka brenda territorit t\u00eb saj dy nga pasurit\u00eb minerare m\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme t\u00eb vendit. Minier\u00ebn e Selenic\u00ebs dhe nd\u00ebrmarrjen m\u00eb t\u00eb madhe t\u00eb prodhimit t\u00eb naft\u00ebs n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri, at\u00eb t\u00eb Gorrishtit.<\/p>\n
A ka dijeni Komisioni sa rent\u00eb minerare p\u00ebrfiton shteti nga prodhimi i rreth 35 mij\u00eb ton\u00ebve naft\u00eb bruto n\u00eb vit nga Gorrishti i Selenic\u00ebs?<\/p>\n
Cilat nga bashkit\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb quhen bashki pas reform\u00ebs japin nj\u00eb kontribut kaq t\u00eb madh n\u00eb buxhetin e shtetit?!<\/p>\n
Problemi i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb q\u00ebndron te ligji p\u00ebr taksat komb\u00ebtare.<\/p>\n
Bashkive q\u00eb kan\u00eb pasuri natyrore u kthehet vet\u00ebm 5% e rent\u00ebs minerare (e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb 10%), q\u00eb n\u00eb praktik\u00eb p\u00ebrkthehet n\u00eb vet\u00ebm 0.5% t\u00eb vler\u00ebs s\u00eb prodhimit.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr kat\u00ebr vite me radh\u00eb jam p\u00ebrpjekur p\u00ebr ta ndryshuar k\u00ebt\u00eb ligj. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb iniciativ\u00eb m\u2019u bashkua edhe OSBE-ja, por s\u00ebrish nuk arrit\u00ebm ta realizojm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb ndryshim, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb vlera q\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb bashkit\u00eb, t\u00eb shkonte nga 5% n\u00eb 30% t\u00eb rent\u00ebs minerare.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, un\u00eb mendoj se bashkia Selenic\u00eb i plot\u00ebson t\u00eb gjitha kriteret, p\u00ebr t\u00eb vazhduar t\u00eb funksionoj\u00eb me sukses si bashki m\u00eb vete.<\/p>\n
Uroj q\u00eb Kuvendi i Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb ta respektoj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb realitet, t\u00eb d\u00ebgjoj\u00eb z\u00ebrin e qytetar\u00ebve dhe ta lejoj\u00eb Selenic\u00ebn t\u00eb vazhdoj\u00eb t\u00eb funksionoj\u00eb si bashki m\u00eb vete!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Deputeti i PS, Vullnet Sinaj, ka dal\u00eb kund\u00ebr Ram\u00ebs p\u00ebr shkrirjes s\u00eb bashkive. Sinaj shpreht kund\u00ebr bashkimit t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Selenic\u00eb me Bashkin\u00eb Vlor\u00eb. N\u00eb nj\u00eb postim n\u00eb rrjete sociale, Sinaj shkruan se problemi, sipas tij, nuk q\u00ebndron te numri i bashkive, por te mungesa e financimit p\u00ebr pushtetin vendor. Sipas tij, vendimmarrja duhet t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetet …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":150244,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-150239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150239"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150239\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":150243,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150239\/revisions\/150243"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/150244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}