{"id":153235,"date":"2026-09-11T08:26:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T08:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/?p=153235"},"modified":"2026-09-11T09:14:15","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T09:14:15","slug":"divjaka-nuk-duhet-te-shkrihet-shifrat-dhe-faktet-jane-ne-anen-e-banoreve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/2026\/09\/11\/divjaka-nuk-duhet-te-shkrihet-shifrat-dhe-faktet-jane-ne-anen-e-banoreve\/","title":{"rendered":"Divjaka nuk duhet t\u00eb shkrihet! Shifrat dhe faktet jan\u00eb n\u00eb an\u00ebn e banor\u00ebve"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nga Ylli ASLLANI<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pas nd\u00ebrprerjes s\u00eb nj\u00ebanshme t\u00eb aktivitetit t\u00eb Komisionit p\u00ebr Reform\u00ebn Territoriale, qeveria me shpejt\u00ebsi ka hedhur p\u00ebr \u2018konsultim\u2019 nj\u00eb projekt, i cili n\u00eb fakt duhej t\u00eb ishte konsultuar m\u00eb par\u00eb me qytetar\u00ebt.
\nKalimi nga 61 n\u00eb 46 bashki ka ngjallur pak\u00ebnaq\u00ebsi n\u00eb mbar\u00eb vendin! Qytetar\u00ebt e mbetur ende n\u00eb k\u00ebto troje po p\u00ebrballen me pasojat traumatike t\u00eb Reform\u00ebs Administrative-Territoriale t\u00eb vitit 2014!
\nShuarja e strukturave t\u00eb nj\u00ebsive vendore, si dhe largimi i rreth 450 mij\u00eb shqiptar\u00ebve ka tronditur sigurin\u00eb komb\u00ebtare.
\nKy makth ka b\u00ebr\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00eb Divjak\u00eb, kund\u00ebrshtimi \u00ebsht\u00eb kthyer n\u00eb nj\u00eb revolt\u00eb qytetare t\u00eb pazakont\u00eb.
\nP\u00ebr m\u00eb shum\u00eb se 40 dit\u00eb, banor\u00eb pa dallim bindjesh politike, s\u00eb bashku me K\u00ebshillin Bashkiak, po k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb t\u00eb mos shkrihet bashkia e tyre.
\nMesazhi i tyre \u00ebsht\u00eb i qart\u00eb:
\nDIVJAKA DUHET T\u00cb MBETET BASHKI!
\nKjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr privilegje. \u00cbsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb qeverisur vetveten, n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimet kushtetuese dhe Kart\u00ebn Evropiane t\u00eb Vet\u00ebqeverisjes Vendore.
\nN\u00eb nj\u00eb demokraci funksionale, kur ndryshohen kufijt\u00eb vendor\u00eb, qytetar\u00ebt duhet t\u00eb pyeten realisht. Ata nuk mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb thjesht objekt i nj\u00eb vendimi administrativ.
\nDivjaka ka probleme reale me sh\u00ebrbimet, por ato nuk vijn\u00eb prej ekzistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb bashkis\u00eb:
\nNdaj mos e nd\u00ebshkoni Divjak\u00ebn p\u00ebr problemet q\u00eb vet\u00eb shteti nuk i ka zgjidhur!
\nK\u00ebto probleme nuk provojn\u00eb se bashkia duhet t\u00eb zhduket. P\u00ebrkundrazi, provojn\u00eb se ajo ka nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr m\u00eb shum\u00eb investime, m\u00eb shum\u00eb financim dhe m\u00eb shum\u00eb kapacitete.
\nN\u00ebse qeveria pretendon se shkrirja me Lushnj\u00ebn do t’i p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsoj\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimet, at\u00ebher\u00eb le ta provoj\u00eb me shifra, buxhet, investime, akses n\u00eb sh\u00ebrbime dhe vullnetin e qytetar\u00ebve.
\nDivjaka ka 24.882 banor\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa Lushnja 63.135. N\u00eb vitin 2024, Divjaka kishte 5.570 fermer\u00eb aktiv\u00eb, m\u00eb shum\u00eb se gjysm\u00ebn e numrit t\u00eb Lushnj\u00ebs, me 10.905 fermer\u00eb.
\nK\u00ebto shifra tregojn\u00eb pesh\u00ebn e jasht\u00ebzakonshme t\u00eb bujq\u00ebsis\u00eb n\u00eb ekonomin\u00eb e Divjak\u00ebs.
\nPor edhe treguesit e sh\u00ebrbimeve jan\u00eb nj\u00eb argument p\u00ebr investim, jo p\u00ebr shkrirje:
\nuj\u00ebsjell\u00ebsi mbulon 69% t\u00eb qendr\u00ebs, por vet\u00ebm 42% t\u00eb periferis\u00eb;
\nkanalizimet mbulojn\u00eb 44% t\u00eb qendr\u00ebs, por vet\u00ebm 16% t\u00eb periferis\u00eb;
\nmbulimi me sh\u00ebrbimin e mbetjeve \u00ebsht\u00eb rreth 55%, kundrejt 76.5% n\u00eb nivel komb\u00ebtar.
\nA jan\u00eb k\u00ebto shifra arsye p\u00ebr t\u00eb fshir\u00eb Divjak\u00ebn nga harta? Jo. Ato jan\u00eb arsye p\u00ebr ta financuar dhe forcuar.
\nProblemi i Divjak\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ekzistenca e bashkis\u00eb. Problemi \u00ebsht\u00eb pamjaftueshm\u00ebria e fondeve qeveritar p\u00ebr nevojat e territorit.
\nDhe duhet t\u00eb kujtojm\u00eb nj\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb t\u00eb thjesht\u00eb: m\u00eb shum\u00eb territor nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb domosdoshm\u00ebrisht m\u00eb shum\u00eb eficienc\u00eb.
\nEficienca matet me cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e sh\u00ebrbimit, koston p\u00ebr nj\u00ebsi, investimin p\u00ebr banor dhe koh\u00ebn q\u00eb i duhet qytetarit p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb sh\u00ebrbimin.
\nPo Lushnja, a garanton zgjidhjen?
\nEdhe k\u00ebtu k\u00ebrkohen prova.
\nN\u00eb analiz\u00ebn e Qarkut Fier, kanalizimet n\u00eb periferin\u00eb e Lushnj\u00ebs rezultojn\u00eb vet\u00ebm 20%, kundrejt 54% n\u00eb qend\u00ebr.
\nNd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn 2018\u20132020 jan\u00eb dokumentuar 18 shkolla 9-vje\u00e7are t\u00eb mbyllura n\u00eb Bashkin\u00eb Lushnj\u00eb, nga 31 mbyllje n\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb qarkun \u2013 ose 58% e totalit t\u00eb dokumentuar.
\nAt\u00ebher\u00eb pyetja \u00ebsht\u00eb e pashmangshme:
\nN\u00ebse Lushnja nuk i ka zgjidhur ende plot\u00ebsisht problemet brenda territorit q\u00eb administron sot, ku \u00ebsht\u00eb garancia se, duke marr\u00eb edhe 24.882 banor\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb, sh\u00ebrbimet p\u00ebr Divjak\u00ebn do t\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsohen?
\nDivjaka nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb bashki n\u00eb falimentim!
\nKy \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr fakt q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb anashkalohet.
\nSipas Raportit t\u00eb Ministris\u00eb s\u00eb Financave p\u00ebr Statusin e V\u00ebshtir\u00ebsis\u00eb Financiare 2024, detyrimet e prapambetura t\u00eb Bashkis\u00eb Divjak\u00eb ishin 38.77 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb, ose 7.47% e shpenzimeve faktike.
\nPra, sipas k\u00ebtij treguesi, Divjaka nuk klasifikohet si bashki n\u00eb v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsi financiare. Madje n\u00eb vitin 2023 treguesi ishte vet\u00ebm 1.31%.
\nPra, nuk kemi p\u00ebrpara nj\u00eb bashki q\u00eb po shembet financiarisht dhe q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon shp\u00ebtim p\u00ebrmes shkrirjes.
\nKemi nj\u00eb bashki me probleme reale zhvillimi dhe sh\u00ebrbimesh, e cila k\u00ebrkon fuqizim, jo zhdukje.
\nDivjaka nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht nj\u00eb num\u00ebr n\u00eb hart\u00eb
\nDivjaka ka nj\u00eb identitet t\u00eb qart\u00eb ekonomik, territorial dhe mjedisor: bujq\u00ebsin\u00eb, zon\u00ebn bregdetare, turizmin, Parkun Komb\u00ebtar Divjak\u00eb\u2013Karavasta, biodiversitetin, ujitjen, kullimin dhe infrastruktur\u00ebn rurale.
\nKy \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb territor funksional q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon politika t\u00eb integruara p\u00ebr bujq\u00ebsin\u00eb, turizmin, mjedisin, uj\u00ebrat dhe zhvillimin e q\u00ebndruesh\u00ebm.
\nDivjaka duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebhet qend\u00ebr e nj\u00eb politike zhvillimi, jo periferi e nj\u00eb harte t\u00eb re administrative.
\nJo shkrirje, por bashk\u00ebpunim me Lushnj\u00ebn
\nEkziston nj\u00eb alternativ\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb racionale: Divjaka dhe Lushnja mund t\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunojn\u00eb pa u shkrir\u00eb.
\nMund t\u00eb krijojn\u00eb sh\u00ebrbime t\u00eb p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebta aty ku ka ekonomi shkalle; t\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunojn\u00eb p\u00ebr mbetjet, turizmin, infrastruktur\u00ebn, bujq\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe projektet e zhvillimit rajonal.
\nBashk\u00ebpunimi nuk k\u00ebrkon domosdoshm\u00ebrisht shkrirje administrative.
\nEkspertiza jon\u00eb propozon ruajtjen e Divjak\u00ebs, forcimin e saj financiar dhe administrativ dhe marr\u00ebveshje funksionale me Lushnj\u00ebn, Fierin e Rrogozhin\u00ebn p\u00ebr sh\u00ebrbime t\u00eb caktuara.
\nQeveria duhet t’u p\u00ebrgjigjet qytetar\u00ebve
\nN\u00ebse k\u00ebrkohet shkrirja e Divjak\u00ebs, qeveria duhet t\u00eb jap\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje konkrete:
\nSa do t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitoj\u00eb qytetari? Sa kilometra do t\u00eb udh\u00ebtoj\u00eb m\u00eb pak ai p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb sh\u00ebrbime?
\nKush do t\u00eb jen\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesit e qytetar\u00ebve n\u00eb Divjak\u00eb?
\nSa do t\u00eb rriten investimet p\u00ebr banor? Sa do t\u00eb ulet kostoja e administrimit?
\nSa do t\u00eb investohet n\u00eb uj\u00ebsjell\u00ebs e kanalizime? Sa n\u00eb rrug\u00ebt rurale, ujitje e kullim?
\nSa n\u00eb turiz\u00ebm dhe n\u00eb mbrojtjen e Parkut Divjak\u00eb\u2013Karavasta?
\nDhe mbi t\u00eb gjitha: \u00c7far\u00eb fiton konkretisht qytetari i Divjak\u00ebs nga shkrirja?
\nN\u00ebse k\u00ebtyre pyetjeve nuk u jepet nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje e matshme, at\u00ebher\u00eb nuk kemi nj\u00eb argument p\u00ebr shkrirjen.
\nKemi vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb propozim politik p\u00ebr ndryshimin e hart\u00ebs.
\nDIVJAKA NUK K\u00cbRKON FAVORE. K\u00cbRKON T\u00cb DREJT\u00cbN P\u00cbR T\u00cb QEVERISUR VETEN.
\nMbrojtja e Bashkis\u00eb Divjak\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb mbrojtje e nj\u00eb administrate p\u00ebr hir t\u00eb administrat\u00ebs. \u00cbsht\u00eb mbrojtje e qytetarit, territorit, demokracis\u00eb lokale dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb pasur qeverisjen pran\u00eb vendit ku jeton.
\nMos e hiqni nga harta nj\u00eb bashki sepse ka nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr investime.
\nPara se ta shkrini, investoni n\u00eb t\u00eb. Forcojeni. Jepini fonde. Jepini p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi.
\nOse, s\u00eb paku, transferojini bashkive burime reale si gjith\u00eb Europa, jo vet\u00ebm rreth 1%, por t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn 3% t\u00eb PBB-s\u00eb \u2013 dhe pastaj matni eficienc\u00ebn e tyre.
\nSepse nj\u00eb reform\u00eb territoriale nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e suksesshme thjesht sepse ka m\u00eb pak bashki.
\nAjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e suksesshme vet\u00ebm kur qytetari merr:
\nm\u00eb shum\u00eb sh\u00ebrbime, m\u00eb shpejt, m\u00eb af\u00ebr dhe me kosto m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebt.
\nPrandaj:
\nDIVJAKA DUHET T\u00cb MBETET BASHKI!
\nJo p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur nj\u00eb administrat\u00eb.
\nPor p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur qytetarin, territorin dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e tij p\u00ebr t’u qeverisur pran\u00eb vendit ku jeton.
\nZ\u00ebri i 24.882 banor\u00ebve t\u00eb Divjak\u00ebs duhet t\u00eb d\u00ebgjohet dhe t\u00eb respektohet.<\/p>\n

\"May\"May\"May\"Mund<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nga Ylli ASLLANI Pas nd\u00ebrprerjes s\u00eb nj\u00ebanshme t\u00eb aktivitetit t\u00eb Komisionit p\u00ebr Reform\u00ebn Territoriale, qeveria me shpejt\u00ebsi ka hedhur p\u00ebr \u2018konsultim\u2019 nj\u00eb projekt, i cili n\u00eb fakt duhej t\u00eb ishte konsultuar m\u00eb par\u00eb me qytetar\u00ebt. Kalimi nga 61 n\u00eb 46 bashki ka ngjallur pak\u00ebnaq\u00ebsi n\u00eb mbar\u00eb vendin! Qytetar\u00ebt e mbetur ende n\u00eb k\u00ebto troje po …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":151761,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-153235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153235"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153235\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":153256,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153235\/revisions\/153256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/151761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}