Prokuroria e Posa\u00e7me, n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb hetimeve p\u00ebr kryetarin e Bashkis\u00eb s\u00eb Shkodr\u00ebs, Benet Beci, ka arritur n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ai duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjet penalisht p\u00ebr akuz\u00ebn e \u201cShkeljes s\u00eb barazis\u00eb n\u00eb tendera\u201d. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, SPAK i ka k\u00ebrkuar Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Posa\u00e7me ta d\u00ebnoj\u00eb me 2 vite burg.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb shkurtuar, d\u00ebnimi reduktohet n\u00eb 1 vit e 4 muaj burg. Megjithat\u00eb, SPAK ka k\u00ebrkuar pezullimin e ekzekutimit t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit dhe vendosjen e Becit n\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim prove p\u00ebr nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb kat\u00ebrvje\u00e7are, si dhe p\u00ebrjashtimin e tij nga ushtrimi i funksioneve publike p\u00ebr 5 vite.<\/p>\n
E nj\u00ebjta k\u00ebrkes\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb edhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb pandehur\u00ebn Adela Ruko, bashk\u00ebshorten e Evis Berberit, nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr kat\u00ebr t\u00eb pandehurit e tjer\u00eb prokuroria ka k\u00ebrkuar d\u00ebnime m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebta.<\/p>\n
Tenderi q\u00eb \u00e7oi Benet Becin n\u00eb gjykat\u00eb<\/strong><\/p>\n Ngjarja p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn akuzohet Benet Beci i p\u00ebrket periudh\u00ebs kur ai drejtonte Korporat\u00ebn Elektroenergjetike Shqiptare (KESH), p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb zgjidhej kryetar i Bashkis\u00eb s\u00eb Shkodr\u00ebs.<\/p>\n N\u00eb qend\u00ebr t\u00eb hetimit \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb prokurimi p\u00ebr projektin \u201cZhvillimi Strategjik i Sektorit Energjetik\u201d, me fond limit rreth 69.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb, ose af\u00ebrsisht 700 mij\u00eb euro. Sipas pretendimeve t\u00eb prokuroris\u00eb, kompania e favorizuar ishte \u201cConsulting & Management Albania\u201d sh.p.k.<\/p>\n Hetuesit dyshojn\u00eb se Beci, n\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunim me gjasht\u00eb zyrtar\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb, ka nd\u00ebrhyr\u00eb n\u00eb procedur\u00ebn e tenderimit, duke krijuar avantazhe t\u00eb padrejta p\u00ebr kompanin\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimisht fitoi kontrat\u00ebn.<\/p>\n Mesazhi n\u00eb telefonin e Adela Rukos<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00c7\u00ebshtja e Becit mori nj\u00eb drejtim tjet\u00ebr pas sekuestrimit dhe analizimit t\u00eb materialeve elektronike n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00eb hetimi tjet\u00ebr, ku ishte p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb ish-drejtori i ARRSH-s\u00eb, Evis Berberi.<\/p>\n N\u00eb telefonin e bashk\u00ebshortes s\u00eb tij, Adela Ruko, e cila kishte drejtuar Komisionin e Vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb Ofertave p\u00ebr tenderin e KESH-it, hetuesit gjet\u00ebn komunikime q\u00eb i \u00e7uan te procedura e prokurimit p\u00ebr zhvillimin strategjik t\u00eb sektorit energjetik.<\/p>\n Sipas materialeve t\u00eb hetimit, Benet Becit i ishte propozuar q\u00eb studimi p\u00ebr strategjin\u00eb energjetike t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb t\u00eb realizohej nga nj\u00eb grup profesor\u00ebsh t\u00eb Harvardit. Por n\u00eb materialet elektronike t\u00eb sekuestruara n\u00eb banes\u00ebn e Evis Berberit ishte ruajtur edhe nj\u00eb mesazh q\u00eb ky i fundit i kishte d\u00ebrguar Becit, ku flitej p\u00ebr ndarjen e parave nga kontrata.<\/p>\n \u201c500 mij\u00eb euro p\u00ebr profesor\u00ebt e Harvardit, 320 mij\u00eb euro p\u00ebr ne me dy klas\u00eb shkoll\u00eb\u201d, shkruhej n\u00eb mesazhin e Berberit drejtuar Benet Becit.<\/p>\n Ky komunikim \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb nga elementet m\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme t\u00eb dosjes, pasi ngre dyshime p\u00ebr nj\u00eb ndarje t\u00eb mundshme t\u00eb parave t\u00eb kontrat\u00ebs mes personave t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00ebse ka pasur p\u00ebrfitime t\u00eb paligjshme, duhen verifikuar autenticiteti dhe konteksti i mesazhit, roli i secilit person, pagesat e kryera dhe p\u00ebrfituesit p\u00ebrfundimtar\u00eb.<\/p>\n Dyshimet p\u00ebr manipulimin e tenderit<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00c7\u00ebshtja nuk lidhet vet\u00ebm me rezultatin e tenderit, por edhe me m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn se si \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgatitur dhe zhvilluar e gjith\u00eb procedura.<\/p>\n Sipas pretendimeve t\u00eb SPAK-ut, parregullsit\u00eb kan\u00eb nisur q\u00eb n\u00eb hartimin e dokumentacionit dhe p\u00ebrcaktimin e kritereve t\u00eb konkurrimit. N\u00eb njoftimin zyrtar, prokuroria identifikon kat\u00ebr faza ku pretendon se jan\u00eb kryer shkelje: p\u00ebrllogaritja e fondit limit, hartimi i termave t\u00eb referenc\u00ebs, p\u00ebrcaktimi i kritereve t\u00eb tenderit dhe vler\u00ebsimi i ofertave.<\/p>\n SPAK p\u00ebrmend shkeljen e disa dispozitave t\u00eb ligjit t\u00eb at\u00ebhersh\u00ebm p\u00ebr prokurimin publik, konkretisht t\u00eb neneve 1, 2, 20, 24 dhe 46, si dhe t\u00eb neneve 28 dhe 61 t\u00eb VKM-s\u00eb nr. 914\/2014.<\/p>\n Dyshimi kryesor \u00ebsht\u00eb se kriteret e tenderit mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb hartuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb q\u00eb t\u2019i krijonin avantazh paraprakisht nj\u00eb kompanie t\u00eb caktuar, duke cenuar konkurrenc\u00ebn q\u00eb p\u00ebrpara dor\u00ebzimit t\u00eb ofertave.<\/p>\n Nj\u00eb ofertues dhe nj\u00eb kontrat\u00eb pothuajse sa fondi limit<\/strong><\/p>\n Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr element q\u00eb ngre pik\u00ebpyetje \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebnyra se si p\u00ebrfundoi procedura e prokurimit.<\/p>\n Tenderi u shpall m\u00eb 13 janar 2020, me nj\u00eb fond limit prej 69.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00ebsh pa TVSH. N\u00eb gar\u00eb mori pjes\u00eb vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb operator ekonomik, kompania \u201cConsulting & Management Albania\u201d, n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb biznesmenit Ervis Myftari.<\/p>\n Oferta fituese ishte 69.35 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb pa TVSH, ose rreth 99.8% e fondit limit. Diferenca mes fondit t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar nga KESH dhe ofert\u00ebs fituese ishte vet\u00ebm rreth 150 mij\u00eb lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n Pjes\u00ebmarrja e vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb kompanie dhe fakti q\u00eb oferta fituese ishte pothuajse sa fondi limit nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb, t\u00eb marra ve\u00e7mas, prova p\u00ebr nj\u00eb shkelje penale. Megjithat\u00eb, t\u00eb kombinuara me dyshimet e SPAK-ut p\u00ebr kritere favorizuese, ato p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb elemente q\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb shqyrtim.<\/p>\n Edhe Kontrolli i Lart\u00eb i Shtetit kishte ngritur pik\u00ebpyetje p\u00ebr nevoj\u00ebn e realizimit t\u00eb k\u00ebtij studimi, duke pasur parasysh se ekzistonte nj\u00eb strategji e m\u00ebparshme p\u00ebr sektorin energjetik.<\/p>\n Pse SPAK k\u00ebrkon pezullimin e d\u00ebnimit me burg?<\/strong><\/p>\n Nj\u00eb nga \u00e7\u00ebshtjet q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon m\u00eb shum\u00eb sqarim n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb dosje \u00ebsht\u00eb k\u00ebrkesa e SPAK-ut p\u00ebr pezullimin e d\u00ebnimit me burg dhe vendosjen e Becit n\u00eb sh\u00ebrbim prove.<\/p>\n Legjislacioni shqiptar parashikon mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e pezullimit t\u00eb ekzekutimit t\u00eb d\u00ebnimit me burg, n\u00ebse plot\u00ebsohen kushtet ligjore p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, k\u00ebrkesa e prokuroris\u00eb nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn n\u00eb vetvete nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb t\u00eb paligjshme.<\/p>\n Megjithat\u00eb, mbetet p\u00ebr t\u2019u par\u00eb se cilat jan\u00eb arsyet konkrete q\u00eb kan\u00eb \u00e7uar SPAK-un drejt k\u00ebtij q\u00ebndrimi. Duhet t\u00eb sqarohen rrethanat leht\u00ebsuese, vler\u00ebsimi i rrezikshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb vepr\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurit, si dhe arsyet pse nj\u00eb d\u00ebnim pa vuajtje efektive t\u00eb burgut konsiderohet i p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n Nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr element q\u00eb duhet pasur parasysh \u00ebsht\u00eb dallimi mes paraburgimit dhe d\u00ebnimit p\u00ebrfundimtar. Masat e siguris\u00eb gjat\u00eb hetimit nuk mund t\u00eb krahasohen drejtp\u00ebrdrejt me pezullimin e nj\u00eb d\u00ebnimi pas p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb gjykimit. P\u00ebr t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar n\u00ebse jan\u00eb zbatuar standarde t\u00eb ndryshme, duhen krahasuar \u00e7\u00ebshtje me vepra penale, rrethana dhe situata procedurale t\u00eb ngjashme.<\/p>\n \u00c7far\u00eb mbetet pa p\u00ebrgjigje?<\/strong><\/p>\n Dosja e Benet Becit ngre disa pyetje q\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb sqarim publik:<\/p>\n A \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikuar plot\u00ebsisht komunikimi p\u00ebr ndarjen e 320 mij\u00eb eurove dhe cili ishte konteksti i tij?<\/p>\n A jan\u00eb identifikuar pagesat reale p\u00ebr studimin, n\u00ebnkontraktor\u00ebt dhe p\u00ebrfituesit p\u00ebrfundimtar\u00eb?<\/p>\n A \u00ebsht\u00eb realizuar dhe dor\u00ebzuar studimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin KESH zhvilloi tenderin?<\/p>\n Pse akuza penale \u00ebsht\u00eb kufizuar te shkelja e barazis\u00eb n\u00eb tendera? A jan\u00eb shqyrtuar edhe elementet e mundshme t\u00eb veprave t\u00eb tjera penale?<\/p>\n Cilat jan\u00eb arsyet konkrete q\u00eb SPAK ka paraqitur p\u00ebr pezullimin e d\u00ebnimit me burg?<\/p>\n \u00c7far\u00eb q\u00ebndrimi ka mbajtur mbrojtja e Benet Becit lidhur me komunikimet e zbuluara dhe pretendimet e prokuroris\u00eb?<\/p>\n K\u00ebto pyetje nuk n\u00ebnkuptojn\u00eb se jan\u00eb kryer edhe vepra t\u00eb tjera penale, por tregojn\u00eb se cilat jan\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjet q\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb m\u00eb shum\u00eb transparenc\u00eb dhe sqarim.<\/p>\n Rasti i Benet Becit \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr prov\u00eb p\u00ebr transparenc\u00ebn n\u00eb hetimin dhe gjykimin e zyrtar\u00ebve t\u00eb lart\u00eb, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht kur b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e fondeve publike.<\/p>\n SPAK pretendon se nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb publike \u00ebsht\u00eb manipuluar p\u00ebr t\u2019i krijuar avantazhe nj\u00eb kompanie t\u00eb caktuar. Por \u00e7\u00ebshtja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse Beci duhet t\u00eb d\u00ebnohet me burg apo n\u00ebse d\u00ebnimi duhet t\u00eb pezullohet. Pyetja kryesore \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00ebse prokuroria ka argumentuar bindsh\u00ebm p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb penale dhe arsyet pse nj\u00eb d\u00ebnim pa vuajtje efektive t\u00eb burgut \u00ebsht\u00eb zgjidhja e p\u00ebrshtatshme.<\/p>\n P\u00ebrgjigjja p\u00ebrfundimtare i takon Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Posa\u00e7me, vendimi dhe arsyetimi i s\u00eb cil\u00ebs do t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsin\u00eb penale t\u00eb t\u00eb pandehurve.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Kronologjia e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes<\/strong><\/p>\n 13 janar 2020<\/strong> \u2013 Shpallet tenderi p\u00ebr projektin \u201cZhvillimi Strategjik i Sektorit Energjetik\u201d, me fond limit 69.5 milion\u00eb lek\u00eb, sipas t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb publikuara nga Politiko.<\/p>\n 4 n\u00ebntor 2024<\/strong> \u2013 Benet Beci paraqitet p\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb shpjegime lidhur me hetimin p\u00ebr periudh\u00ebn kur drejtonte KESH-in.<\/p>\n 9 janar 2026<\/strong> \u2013 SPAK njofton akuzat ndaj shtat\u00eb personave dhe p\u00ebrshkruan mekanizmin e dyshuar t\u00eb favorizimit n\u00eb tender.<\/p>\n 24 shkurt 2026<\/strong> \u2013 Paraqitet k\u00ebrkesa p\u00ebr gjykim t\u00eb shkurtuar.<\/p>\n 20 korrik 2026<\/strong> \u2013 Gjykata pranon k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr gjykim t\u00eb shkurtuar.<\/p>\n 9 n\u00ebntor 2026<\/strong> \u2013 SPAK paraqet pretenc\u00ebn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Prokuroria e Posa\u00e7me, n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb hetimeve p\u00ebr kryetarin e Bashkis\u00eb s\u00eb Shkodr\u00ebs, Benet Beci, ka arritur n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ai duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjet penalisht p\u00ebr akuz\u00ebn e \u201cShkeljes s\u00eb barazis\u00eb n\u00eb tendera\u201d. P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, SPAK i ka k\u00ebrkuar Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Posa\u00e7me ta d\u00ebnoj\u00eb me 2 vite burg. P\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb gjykimit t\u00eb shkurtuar, …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":160294,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160289"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":160296,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160289\/revisions\/160296"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/160294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}