{"id":72401,"date":"2024-02-27T12:49:51","date_gmt":"2024-02-27T12:49:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/?p=72401"},"modified":"2024-02-27T12:49:51","modified_gmt":"2024-02-27T12:49:51","slug":"gjata-perse-nuk-vepron-gjykata-e-larte-ne-favor-te-mbi-500-mije-familjeve-qe-kane-perfituar-nga-procesi-i-legalizimit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/2024\/02\/27\/gjata-perse-nuk-vepron-gjykata-e-larte-ne-favor-te-mbi-500-mije-familjeve-qe-kane-perfituar-nga-procesi-i-legalizimit\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjata: P\u00ebrse nuk vepron Gjykata e Lart\u00eb n\u00eb favor t\u00eb mbi 500 mij\u00eb familjeve q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga procesi i legalizimit?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>DEKLARATE E ANETARIT TE KESHILLIT KOMBETAR TE PD, \u00c7LIRIM GJATA:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>P\u00ebrse Gjykata e Lart\u00eb nuk vepron, n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb Vendimit nr. 35\/2007 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, p\u00ebr t\u00eb udh\u00ebzuar gjykatat e niveleve t\u00eb ul\u00ebta, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb mbi 500 mij\u00eb familjeve q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga procesi i legalizimit duke unifikuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjet administrative konkrete qe po shqyrtohen k\u00ebto dit\u00eb n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn e Lart\u00eb nga Kolegji Administrativ?<\/p>\n<p>A do tentoj\u00eb Gjykata e Lart\u00eb t\u00eb rrezoj\u00eb Vendimin Nr.35 te Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese dhe vet\u00eb ligjin e legalizimeve, n\u00eb d\u00ebm t\u00eb mbi 500 mij\u00eb familjeve q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga ky proces?<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces, Gjykata Kushtetuese arriti n\u00eb konkluzionin, se ekziston \u2018interesi publik\u2019 q\u00eb mund t\u00eb justifikoj\u00eb shpron\u00ebsimin e pronar\u00ebve t\u00eb ligjsh\u00ebm dhe kalimin e pronave t\u00eb tyre n\u00eb pron\u00ebsi t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtuesve t\u00eb nd\u00ebrtimeve pa leje.<\/p>\n<p>Kjo i hapi rrug\u00eb m\u00eb pas, ecuris\u00eb s\u00eb procesit t\u00eb legalizimit, i cili deri n\u00eb ato momente ishte n\u00eb hapat fillestar\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>Por \u00e7far\u00eb hapash mori, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb, p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbatuar k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese. Sipas nenit 132 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, Vendimet e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese jan\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimtare dhe t\u00eb detyrueshme p\u00ebr zbatim.<\/p>\n<p>Gjykata e Lart\u00eb nuk ka nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb ndonj\u00eb vendim p\u00ebr t\u00eb unifikuar apo p\u00ebr nj\u00ebsuar praktik\u00ebn gjyq\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00ebse pranohet \u00e7do padi, q\u00eb kund\u00ebrshton, procesin e legalizimit, at\u00ebher\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vlera q\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtohet, por kund\u00ebrshtohet vet\u00eb \u2018interesi publik\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>As pas \u2018reform\u00ebs n\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi\u2019 dhe pas plot\u00ebsimit me gjith\u00eb trup\u00ebn gjyq\u00ebsore, Gjykata e Lart\u00eb, nuk ka nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb asnj\u00eb hap q\u00eb t\u00eb rregulloj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje.<\/p>\n<p>Gjykata e Lart\u00eb ka detyrimin p\u00ebr t\u00eb nxjerr\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim unifikues apo njehsues n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjet administrative t\u00eb k\u00ebtij lloji.<\/p>\n<p>Do ta b\u00ebj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb apo do t\u00eb tentoj\u00eb t\u00eb rr\u00ebzoj\u00eb me Vendim Gjykate Vendimin Nr.35\/2007 te Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese?<\/p>\n<p>Sepse, jan\u00eb mbi 500 mije familje q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga procesi i legalizimit dhe kan\u00eb marr\u00eb certifikat\u00ebn e pron\u00ebsis\u00eb. Imagjinoni sikur Gjykata e Lart\u00eb t\u00eb hap\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb praktik\u00eb dhe vet\u00ebm t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn 1\/3 e numrit t\u00eb legalizimeve t\u00eb hynte n\u00eb konflikt gjyq\u00ebsor, do t\u00eb kishim jo pak por mbi 166 mij\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb padi n\u00eb gjykata.<\/p>\n<p>Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit (vetingu shk I), jo m\u00eb larg se nj\u00eb muaj m\u00eb par\u00eb ka marr\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim p\u00ebr \u2018Shkarkimin nga detyra e Gjyqtarit\u2019 p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs, pik\u00ebrisht p\u00ebr faktin se kishte marr\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb till\u00eb n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me Vendimin nr. 35\/2007 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n<p>Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit, ka konkluduar se: \u2018subjekti ka demonstruar mang\u00ebsi n\u00eb aspektin e njohurive ligjore, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 72\/2 e ligjit nr. 96\/2016, dhe n\u00eb aspektin e arsyetimit ligjor, n\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb nenit 72\/3 t\u00eb ligjit nr. 96\/2016 n\u00eb lidhje me cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e analiz\u00ebs dhe argumentimit t\u00eb vendimit.<\/p>\n<p>A do lejohen m\u00eb veprime abuzive dhe korruptive, si ato t\u00eb Gjykatave Administrative t\u00eb shkall\u00ebve m\u00eb t\u00eb ul\u00ebta, nga Gjykata e Lart\u00eb dhe n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim nga Vendimi Nr.35\/2007 i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese?<\/p>\n<p>Gjykata e Lart\u00eb, duhet q\u00eb ta shqyrtoj\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb konflit, n\u00eb Kolegjet e Bashkuara t\u00eb saj p\u00ebr unifikim, ku t\u00eb sanksionohet detyrimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbatuar vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb proces kaq t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm dhe jetik p\u00ebr qindra mijra familje q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga procesi i legalizimit.<\/p>\n<p>Gjykata e Lart\u00eb, duhet t\u00eb parandaloj\u00eb, \u00e7do veprim, t\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve pa integritet, p\u00ebr t\u00eb shqyrtuar dhe vendosur n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb abuzive p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb cilat, nuk mund t\u00eb ngrihen pasi \u00ebsht\u00eb vendosur nga Gjykata Kushtetuese. Ndryshe do t\u00eb cenohej siguria juridike e qindra mij\u00ebra pronar\u00ebve q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga ky proces.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DEKLARATE E ANETARIT TE KESHILLIT KOMBETAR TE PD, \u00c7LIRIM GJATA: P\u00ebrse Gjykata e Lart\u00eb nuk vepron, n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb Vendimit nr. 35\/2007 t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, p\u00ebr t\u00eb udh\u00ebzuar gjykatat e niveleve t\u00eb ul\u00ebta, n\u00eb favor t\u00eb mbi 500 mij\u00eb familjeve q\u00eb kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga procesi i legalizimit duke unifikuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjet administrative konkrete qe po shqyrtohen &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":72402,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-72401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72401\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72402"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}