{"id":76897,"date":"2024-04-18T16:21:05","date_gmt":"2024-04-18T16:21:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/?p=76897"},"modified":"2024-04-18T16:24:40","modified_gmt":"2024-04-18T16:24:40","slug":"mburoja-antikushtetuese-e-socialistesve-per-xhacken","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/2024\/04\/18\/mburoja-antikushtetuese-e-socialistesve-per-xhacken\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cMburoja\u201d antikushtetuese e socialist\u00ebve p\u00ebr Xha\u00e7k\u00ebn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Nga Jona P\u00ebllumbi-<a href=\"https:\/\/faktoje.al\/mburoja-antikushtetuese-e-socialistesve-per-olta-xhacken\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Faktoje.al<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Ndryshe nga \u00e7\u2019thot\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7ka, Kushtetuesja nuk shqyrtoi n\u00eb themel dhe as nuk vendosi p\u00ebr mandatin e saj<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pas votimit t\u00eb socialist\u00ebve kund\u00ebr d\u00ebrgimit t\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs nga Gjykata Kushtetuese, deputetja pretendoi se Kushtetuesja ishte shprehur tashm\u00eb p\u00ebr papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb saj. N\u00eb fakt, ekspert\u00ebt argumentojn\u00eb p\u00ebr Faktoje se kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb. Sipas tyre, Kuvendi shkeli detyrimin p\u00ebr d\u00ebrgimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n<p>Refuzimi q\u00eb socialist\u00ebt i b\u00ebn\u00eb d\u00ebrgimit n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb Kushtetuese t\u00eb mocionit t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs p\u00ebr pavlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb deputetes Olta Xha\u00e7ka, u pa gjer\u00ebsisht n\u00eb opinionin publik si sfid\u00eb ndaj sistemit gjyq\u00ebsor.<\/p>\n<p>Kjo sepse Gjykata Kushtetuese n\u00eb vendimin e Janarit 2023 k\u00ebrkoi q\u00eb Kuvendi i Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb t\u00eb merrte vendim n\u00eb K\u00ebshillin e Rregullores, Mandateve dhe Imunitetit dhe m\u00eb pas t\u2019i drejtohej gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsim.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/www.syri.net\/uploads\/syri.net\/images\/2024\/April\/18\/auto_vendimi11713452840.webp\" alt=\"Image\" width=\"595\" height=\"60\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Deputetja Xha\u00e7ka pretendon se Gjykata Kushtetuese \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur p\u00ebr papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb saj, pasi gjykata e ka shqyrtuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjen dhe ka vendosur ta pushoj\u00eb at\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUn\u00eb kam q\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb Gjykat\u00eb Kushtetuese, \u00e7\u00ebshtja ime \u00ebsht\u00eb gjykuar n\u00eb themel, jo p\u00ebr aspekte proceduriale se po t\u00eb ishte ashtu do ishte rr\u00ebzuar q\u00eb n\u00eb dhom\u00eb t\u00eb K\u00ebshillimit. \u00cbsht\u00eb d\u00ebgjuar [mbrojtja] p\u00ebr 10 or\u00eb dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb disponuar me vendim p\u00ebr pushim\u201d, tha Xha\u00e7ka n\u00eb Top Story.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00c7far\u00eb tha Gjykata Kushtetuese<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Deputetja Olta Xha\u00e7ka k\u00ebmb\u00ebngul se Gjykata Kushtetuese nuk i ka k\u00ebrkuar Kuvendit t\u00eb marr\u00eb fillimisht vendim, q\u00eb m\u00eb pas t\u00eb mund t\u00eb shqyrtonte \u00e7\u00ebshtjen, cka bie ndesh me njoftimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese .<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDeklarata e znj. Xha\u00e7ka \u00ebsht\u00eb e pav\u00ebrtet\u00eb\u201d \u2013 vler\u00ebson Ledio Braho, avokat dhe nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht an\u00ebtar i Komisionit t\u00eb Ankesave dhe Sanksioneve n\u00eb KQZ.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKjo pasi pasi Gjykata Kushtetuese, n\u00eb vendimin nr. 1, dat\u00eb 23.01.2023 ka gjykuar se cili \u00ebsht\u00eb subjekti q\u00eb ka t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn t\u2019i drejtohet Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese me k\u00ebrkes\u00eb, n\u00eb rastin kur ka pretendime q\u00eb nj\u00eb deputet i Kuvendit t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb kryer veprimtari fitimprur\u00ebse q\u00eb buron nga pasuria e shtetit ose e pushtetit vendor apo t\u00eb fitojn\u00eb pasuri t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre n\u00eb zbatim t\u00eb nenit 70 pikat 3 dhe 4 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.\u201d \u2013 argumenton Braho.<\/p>\n<p>Ai referon paragraf\u00ebt 54-56 t\u00eb k\u00ebtij vendimi ku Gjykata ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje shteruese se cili \u00ebsht\u00eb organi q\u00eb mund ti drejtohet asaj n\u00eb lidhje me mandatin e deputetes Xha\u00e7ka.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese thuhet se papajtueshm\u00ebria e mandatit t\u00eb deputetes Olta Xha\u00e7ka duhet t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohet nga kjo gjykat\u00eb, por vet\u00ebm pasi t\u00eb shprehet Kuvendi i Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/www.syri.net\/uploads\/syri.net\/images\/2024\/April\/18\/auto_vendimi_mes1713452870.webp\" alt=\"Image\" width=\"511\" height=\"501\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\u201cN\u00eb asnj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj vendimmarrjeje nuk ka element\u00eb t\u00eb gjykimit n\u00eb themel t\u00eb pretendimeve t\u00eb 1\/10 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve sepse GjK ka mbajtur q\u00ebndrimin q\u00eb pa vendimmarrje t\u00eb vet\u00eb Kuvendit, nuk mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb shqyrtim n\u00eb themel t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre pretendimeve nga kjo gjykat\u00eb.\u201d \u2013 Ledio Braho, avokat<\/p>\n<p>Kjo rr\u00ebzon pretendimin e deputetes Xha\u00e7ka se Gjykata e ka shqyrtuar n\u00eb themel \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e saj.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Votimi i 11 prillit n\u00eb Kuvend<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb seanc\u00ebn plenare t\u00eb 11 prillit 72 vota socialist\u00ebsh iu b\u00ebn\u00eb mburoj\u00eb deputetes Xha\u00e7ka, duke mos lejuar miratimin e raportit t\u00eb pakic\u00ebs n\u00eb K\u00ebshillin p\u00ebr Rregulloren dhe Mandatet.<\/p>\n<p>Raporti i pakic\u00ebs s\u00eb K\u00ebshillit p\u00ebr Mandatet dhe Imunitetin pretendon se mandati i Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb i papajtuesh\u00ebm me kushtetut\u00ebn dhe ligjin. Nd\u00ebrsa raporti i shumic\u00ebs s\u00eb K\u00ebshillit vendos se nuk ka asnj\u00eb papajtueshm\u00ebri.<\/p>\n<p>Votimi i 11 Prillit sh\u00ebnoi her\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb q\u00eb Parlamenti refuzoi miratimin e raportit t\u00eb pakic\u00ebs parlamentare n\u00eb K\u00ebshillin p\u00ebr Rregulloren, Mandatet dhe Imunitetin.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00eb 17 n\u00ebntor 2022, ishte hera e par\u00eb kur Kuvendi miratoi vet\u00ebm raportin e shumic\u00ebs s\u00eb K\u00ebshillit q\u00eb \u201cmbronte\u201d Olta Xhack\u00ebn, duke refuzuar miratimin edhe t\u00eb raportit t\u00eb pakic\u00ebs. N\u00eb janar 2023 Kushtetuesja vler\u00ebsoi se mos-votimi i k\u00ebtij mendimi t\u00eb pakic\u00ebs parlamentare ka pamund\u00ebsuar q\u00eb deputet\u00ebt t\u00eb vijojn\u00eb procedur\u00ebn n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/www.syri.net\/uploads\/syri.net\/images\/2024\/April\/18\/auto_vendimi_fund1713452922.webp\" alt=\"Image\" width=\"497\" height=\"310\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Por, mesa duket, ky vendim i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese nuk i ndaloi socialist\u00ebt t\u00eb refuzojn\u00eb p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb dyt\u00eb votimin e k\u00ebtij mocioni, duke pamund\u00ebsuar edhe nj\u00ebher\u00eb d\u00ebrgimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb organi kompetent p\u00ebr marrjen e nj\u00eb vendimi p\u00ebr papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs. \/Faktoje.al\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nga Jona P\u00ebllumbi-Faktoje.al Ndryshe nga \u00e7\u2019thot\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7ka, Kushtetuesja nuk shqyrtoi n\u00eb themel dhe as nuk vendosi p\u00ebr mandatin e saj Pas votimit t\u00eb socialist\u00ebve kund\u00ebr d\u00ebrgimit t\u00eb shqyrtimit t\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs nga Gjykata Kushtetuese, deputetja pretendoi se Kushtetuesja ishte shprehur tashm\u00eb p\u00ebr papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb saj. N\u00eb fakt, ekspert\u00ebt argumentojn\u00eb p\u00ebr &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":47625,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76897\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47625"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}