N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb SPAK t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb mbajtjes n\u00eb arrest pa prova t\u00eb liderit t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs,\u00a0avokati dhe ekipi i tij mbrojt\u00ebs kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar dor\u00ebheqjen e gjykat\u00ebses s\u00eb lart\u00eb Irena Gjoka, e cila vazhdon t\u00eb ushtroj\u00eb detyr\u00ebn n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me ligjin duke fshehur problemet q\u00eb ka pasur me ligjin.<\/p>\n
Avokati Gjokutaj tha se, n\u00ebse gjyqtarja Irena Gjoka nuk jep dor\u00ebheqjen, brenda 3 dit\u00ebve do t\u00eb k\u00ebrkojm\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtimin e saj.<\/p>\n
\u201cK\u00ebrkimi yn\u00eb ose ftesa q\u00eb i b\u00ebm\u00eb gjyqtares p\u00ebr t\u00eb hequr dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje \u00ebsht\u00eb sepse ne kemi ardhur n\u00eb dijeni n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet shtypit grek dhe vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Administrative t\u00eb Athin\u00ebs, e cila pohon ekzistenc\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij fakti. \u00a0Pra, ndalimin e gjyqtares p\u00ebr hyrjen n\u00eb zon\u00ebn Shengen prej 10 vjet\u00ebsh, gj\u00eb q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb pasqyruar n\u00eb formularin e vet\u00ebdeklarimit.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebrse e themi ne ket\u00eb dhe ku q\u00ebndron shkaku yn\u00eb p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb? Shkaku yn\u00eb p\u00ebr heqjen dor\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb se KLGJ n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 4 prill ka atribuar dhe ka insinuar q\u00eb ne k\u00ebto k\u00ebrkesa i b\u00ebjm\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb intimiduar gjykat\u00ebn, k\u00ebto nuk jan\u00eb fakte t\u00eb v\u00ebrteta.<\/p>\n
Por ky fakt \u00ebsht\u00eb i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb sa \u00e7\u2019\u00ebsht\u00eb i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb edhe vendimi q\u00eb ne ia dor\u00ebzuam gjykat\u00ebs, edhe kopjen e gazet\u00ebs greke t\u00eb p\u00ebrkthyer e t\u00eb noterizuar, por duhet t\u00eb kuptoni nj\u00eb gj\u00eb: kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb specifike sepse flitet, nuk ka nevoj\u00eb t\u2019ia aprovojm\u00eb ne faktin, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ky fakt dihet. I vetmi person q\u00eb e di sakt\u00eb dhe qart\u00eb q\u00eb ekziston apo jo \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00eb gjyqtarja, e cila ka qen\u00eb k\u00ebrkuese n\u00eb at\u00eb gjykim p\u00ebr t\u2019u anuluar akti administrativ i ndalimit n\u00eb zon\u00ebn Shengen. Dhe k\u00ebtu ekziston dhe nj\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshje dhe nj\u00eb nj\u00ebanshm\u00ebri dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte ne i k\u00ebrkuam, duke qen\u00eb se ajo nuk i ka pasur kushtet p\u00ebr t\u00eb qen\u00eb gjyqtare dhe vazhdon q\u00eb mund ta \u00e7oj\u00eb gjyqin deri n\u00eb nul, k\u00ebt\u00eb gjykim, anonimi i k\u00ebsja procedure dhe ne i k\u00ebrkuam q\u00eb t\u00eb heq\u00eb dor\u00eb nga gjykimi i \u00e7\u00ebshtjes.<\/p>\n
Ajo nuk pohoi, as mohoi, nuk u shpreh n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb, na i ktheu dokumentet pik\u00ebrisht me k\u00ebt\u00eb arsyetim, q\u00eb b\u00ebhet fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr at\u00eb personalisht dhe nuk ka nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr prova q\u00eb t\u00eb provohet ky fakt. N\u00ebse kjo gjyqtare nuk do t\u00eb jap\u00eb dor\u00ebheqjen, ne, brenda tri dit\u00ebve q\u00eb parashikon Kodi i Procedur\u00ebs Penale, ne do t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb k\u00ebrkimin p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e saj”, tha Gjokutaj.<\/p>\n
Pyetje: Si e keni siguruar vendimin dhe n\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb forme ia keni depozituar gjykat\u00ebses?<\/strong><\/p>\n Gjokutaj:<\/strong>\u00a0Ju duhet t\u00eb kuptoni q\u00eb ne kemi nj\u00eb vendim fotokopje dhe vendimin e gjykat\u00ebs, kemi gazet\u00ebn \u201cProtothema\u201d;\u00a0n\u00eb faqen 16 t\u00eb saj e ka parashtruar k\u00ebt\u00eb fakt. Si e kemi siguruar ne k\u00ebt\u00eb?! Nuk ka r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi se si \u00ebsht\u00eb siguruar. Kodi i Procedur\u00ebs Penale, n\u00eb nenin 149, pika 2, thot\u00eb: Gjykata mund t\u00eb marr\u00eb edhe nj\u00eb prov\u00eb q\u00eb nuk rregullohet me ligj ose nuk ka parametrat ligjor\u00eb me kushtinq\u00eb t\u00eb mos cenohet liria e vullnetit t\u00eb personit. Ne jemi n\u00eb k\u00ebto kushte, por edhe nj\u00ebher\u00eb ju them q\u00eb kjo k\u00ebrkes\u00eb q\u00eb ne b\u00ebm\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb hequr dor\u00eb gjyqtarja, ajo duhet t\u2019i b\u00ebj\u00eb nj\u00eb gjykim vetvetes. Pse? Sepse nuk flitet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb rrethan\u00eb jasht\u00eb k\u00ebsaj gjykate\u00a0ose p\u00ebr nj gjyqtar tjet\u00ebr ose p\u00ebr nj d\u00ebshmitar apo nj\u00eb person n\u00ebn hetim. Flitet personalisht p\u00ebr nj\u00eb nj\u00eb gjyqtare, e cila ka qen\u00eb k\u00ebrkuese n\u00eb at\u00eb gjykim. Pra, ajo nuk ka ku t\u2019i shmanget k\u00ebsaj historie sepse ka qen\u00eb k\u00ebrkuese. Pra, ai gjykim q\u00eb ka p\u00ebrfunduar n\u00eb 2004 (pasi \u00ebsht\u00eb ndaluar dy her\u00eb, n\u00eb 2002, 2003), i dhjetorit 2004, ajo gjykat\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje pik\u00ebrisht nga k\u00ebrkuesja, gjyqtarja Irena Gjoka.<\/p>\n Pyetje: Ju that\u00eb se do t\u00eb b\u00ebni nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjashtimin e saj. Prokuroria e P\u00ebrgjithshme pretendon dhe deklaron zyrtarisht se ka nisur nj\u00eb verifikim p\u00ebr rastin e zyrtares. A keni ju informacion si mbrojt\u00ebs i z. Berisha se \u00e7far\u00eb faze \u00ebsht\u00eb verifikimi?<\/strong><\/p>\n Gjokutaj:<\/strong>\u00a0Ne kemi b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha k\u00ebrkimet shkres\u00ebrisht sepse ata jan\u00eb t\u00eb detyruar t\u00eb na pajisin me dokumente, q\u00eb lidhen pik\u00ebrisht me \u00e7\u00ebshtjen q\u00eb ne mbrojm\u00eb. Dhe k\u00ebt\u00eb e parashikon edhe ligji p\u00ebr avokatin\u00eb q\u00eb \u00e7do institucion shtet\u00ebror apo privat \u00ebsht\u00eb i detyruar t\u2019i jap\u00eb avokatit, aktet q\u00eb lidhen me \u00e7\u00ebshtjen q\u00eb ai ka n\u00eb mbrojtje.<\/p>\n Pyetje: N\u00ebse ky fakt rezulton i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb, si do t\u00eb vijohet me procedimin gjyq\u00ebsor ndaj z. Berisha?<\/strong><\/p>\n Gjokutaj:\u00a0<\/strong>Fakti \u00ebsht\u00eb i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb. Tani problemi \u00ebsht\u00eb se sa t\u00eb qart\u00eb ligjor\u00eb do t\u00eb jen\u00eb institucionet. Pjesa jon\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb pjesa e mbrojtjes. Paralelisht un\u00eb mendoj se organet shtet\u00ebrore duhet, s\u00eb paku Prokuroria e P\u00ebrgjithshme duhet t\u00eb d\u00ebrgoj\u00eb nj\u00eb let\u00ebr \u2013porosi n\u00eb Greqi dhe t\u2019i marr\u00eb k\u00ebto prova. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb rast shum\u00eb flagrant sepse k\u00ebtu nuk flitet p\u00ebr nj\u00eb person, gjyqtaren n\u00eb fjal\u00eb (p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk kemi asgj\u00eb personalisht) por kjo gjyqtare, af\u00ebrmendsh q\u00eb vendimin do ta jap\u00eb pasi t\u00eb konsultohet, si\u00e7 ka b\u00ebr\u00eb q\u00eb nga fillimi i k\u00ebsaj \u00e7\u00ebshtjeje, sepse e kemi th\u00ebn\u00eb, ky nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb proces gjyq\u00ebsor. Ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb proces i past\u00ebr politik dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim, edhe parashikimet tona ligjore shpeshher\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb ardhur n\u00eb paralele me at\u00eb q\u00eb ka rezultuar n\u00eb fund apo me vendimmarrjen q\u00eb kjo gjykat\u00eb ka kryer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim t\u00eb seanc\u00ebs n\u00eb SPAK t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb mbajtjes n\u00eb arrest pa prova t\u00eb liderit t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs,\u00a0avokati dhe ekipi i tij mbrojt\u00ebs kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar dor\u00ebheqjen e gjykat\u00ebses s\u00eb lart\u00eb Irena Gjoka, e cila vazhdon t\u00eb ushtroj\u00eb detyr\u00ebn n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me ligjin duke fshehur problemet q\u00eb ka pasur me ligjin. Avokati Gjokutaj tha se, n\u00ebse …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":63290,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-79381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79381\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/63290"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}