{"id":86018,"date":"2024-08-01T16:49:14","date_gmt":"2024-08-01T16:49:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/?p=86018"},"modified":"2024-08-01T16:49:14","modified_gmt":"2024-08-01T16:49:14","slug":"gjykata-njelloj-si-rama-po-nxit-krize-kushtetuese-per-te-mbrojtur-mandatin-e-xhackes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/2024\/08\/01\/gjykata-njelloj-si-rama-po-nxit-krize-kushtetuese-per-te-mbrojtur-mandatin-e-xhackes\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjykata nj\u00eblloj si Rama, po nxit \u201ckriz\u00eb kushtetuese\u201d p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur mandatin e Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nga\u00a0Boldnews.al<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast thuajse t\u00eb paprecedent, n\u00eb vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese p\u00ebr mandatin e Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs, pranohet t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn dy her\u00eb se kjo \u00e7\u00ebshtje ka nxitur \u201ckriz\u00eb kushtetuese<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Shumica e trup\u00ebs gjykuese vler\u00ebson se refuzimi i shumic\u00ebs parlamentare socialiste p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbatuar nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, ku detyrohej Parlamenti t\u00eb d\u00ebrgonte para saj rastin \u201cXha\u00e7ka\u201d ka \u00e7uar \u201cn\u00eb\u00a0nj\u00eb kriz\u00eb kushtetuese<\/u><\/strong>, e cila c\u00ebnon thelbin e shtetit demokratik\u2026<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast tjet\u00ebr, brenda t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtit vendim, gjyqtarja e vetme n\u00eb pakic\u00eb, Sonila Bejtja, p\u00ebrmend s\u00ebrish shprehjen \u201ckriz\u00eb kushtetuese<\/em>\u201d, por k\u00ebsaj radhe duke iu referuar q\u00ebndrimit t\u00eb shumic\u00ebs s\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebve, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt treguan sjellje injoruese ndaj k\u00ebrkesave t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb legjitimuar nga Kushtetuta, nj\u00eb t\u00eb pest\u00ebs s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve.<\/p>\n

\u201cMosdh\u00ebnia p\u00ebrgjigje, n\u00eb thelb, t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve n\u00eb lidhje me papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb deputetes Olta Xha\u00e7ka, do t\u00eb krijonte nj\u00eb impass t\u00eb till\u00eb, i cili do t\u00eb p\u00ebrkthehej\u00a0n\u00eb kriz\u00eb kushtetuese<\/u><\/strong>\u201d,<\/em> mban q\u00ebndrimin gjyqtarja n\u00eb pakic\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\u00c7\u00ebshtja \u201cXha\u00e7ka\u201d n\u00eb kalendat greke<\/strong><\/p>\n

N\u00eb prill t\u00eb vitit 2024, Gjykata Kushtetuese pranoi t\u00eb shqyrtonte nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb me disa objekte, t\u00eb cilat lidheshin me mandatin e deputetes Olta Xha\u00e7ka, pasi bashk\u00ebshorti i saj, Artan Ga\u00e7i, p\u00ebrfitoi statusin e \u201cinvestitorit strategjik\u201d dhe leht\u00ebsira t\u00eb tjera nga qeveria e kryeministrit Edi Rama.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn d\u00ebrguar Kushtetueses, 1\/10 e deputet\u00ebve, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs, k\u00ebrkuan q\u00eb Gjykata t\u00eb detyronte Kuvendin t\u00eb zbatonte nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb m\u00ebhersh\u00ebm t\u00eb trup\u00ebs gjykuese, e cila kishte k\u00ebrkuar nga ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebsit q\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebrgonin p\u00ebr interpretim vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn k\u00ebrkes\u00eb, 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve, po p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs, k\u00ebrkonin interpretimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese p\u00ebr nenet e Ligjit Themeltar q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me pavlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb deputetit.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pik\u00eb t\u00eb dyt\u00eb t\u00eb objektit, mbeti e paqart\u00eb n\u00ebse k\u00ebrkohej drejt\u00ebp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb shpallja e pavlefshme e mandatit t\u00eb Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs, p\u00ebr aq koh\u00eb sa\u00a0p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesi<\/a>\u00a0i k\u00ebrkuesve nuk e deklaroi shprehimisht di\u00e7ka t\u00eb till\u00eb n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare para Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese. Megjithat\u00eb shqyrtimi i k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkese do t\u00eb jepte nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje edhe p\u00ebr vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb ligjv\u00ebn\u00ebses socialiste.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb 10 Korrik 2024, Gjykata Kushtetuese, me nj\u00eb votim 8-1, vendosi t\u00eb pranoj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e 1\/10 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve, ku ritheksohet detyrimi i Parlamentit p\u00ebr ta d\u00ebrguar rastin \u201cXha\u00e7ka\u201d para trup\u00ebs gjykuese.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Gjykata Kushtetuese ri-k\u00ebrkon nga Parlamenti t\u00eb d\u00ebrgoj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen \u201cXha\u00e7ka\u201d p\u00ebr shqyrtim<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, s\u00ebrish si n\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm, t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb Shkurt 2023, Gjykata Kushtetuese nuk mori n\u00eb shqyrtim k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve, e cila mund t\u2019i jepte zgjidhje p\u00ebrfundimtare \u00e7\u00ebshtjes \u201cXha\u00e7ka\u201d.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendimin prej 36 faqesh, t\u00eb zbardhur n\u00eb fund t\u00eb Korrikut, Gjykata Kushtetuese ka analizuar gjer\u00ebsisht k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e 1\/10 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve, duke u ndalur kryesisht n\u00eb \u201creagimin<\/em>\u201d e saj p\u00ebr injorimin q\u00eb i b\u00ebri shumica parlamentare vendimit t\u00eb saj nr.1 t\u00eb vitit 2023, ku k\u00ebrkoi nga Kuvendi q\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebrgonte p\u00ebr intepretim pran\u00eb saj k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e vlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Shumica e trup\u00ebs gjykuese tregohet \u201ce indinjuar\u201d me q\u00ebndrimin refuzues t\u00eb maxhoranc\u00ebs parlamentare, duke i rikujtuar se vendimet e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese jan\u00eb detyrimisht t\u00eb zbatueshme dhe nuk mund t\u00eb analizohen apo t\u00eb hidhen posht\u00eb nga asnj\u00eb institucion tjet\u00ebr.<\/p>\n

\u201cGjykata vler\u00ebson se Kuvendi nuk ka vepruar n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me Kushtetut\u00ebn p\u00ebr sa koh\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e ekzekutimit t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb saj ia ka n\u00ebnshtruar vler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit p\u00ebr Legjislacionin dhe K\u00ebshillit p\u00ebr Mandatet, struktura n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat shumica parlamentare ka v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dyshim fuqin\u00eb detyruese t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs\u2026\u201d,<\/em>\u00a0thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e miratuar nga shumica e gjyqtar\u00ebve kushtetues.<\/p>\n

M\u00eb tej, thuhet se \u201cGjykata arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se Kuvendi nuk ka respektuar vendimmarrjen e Gjykat\u00ebs, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me detyrimin kushtetues q\u00eb buron nga neni 132 i Kushtetut\u00ebs\u2026<\/em>\u00a0Ky refuzim i Kuvendit p\u00ebr zbatimin e vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs ka \u00e7uar n\u00eb krijimin e nj\u00eb krize kushtetuese\u00a0<\/em>q\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm c\u00ebnon themelet e shtetit demokratik dhe humb besimin e publikut te shteti dhe organet e tij, por v\u00eb n\u00eb diskutim edhe vet\u00eb rolin dhe funksionin e Gjykat\u00ebs\u2026<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Gjykata Kushtetuese \u201ckritikon\u201d maxhoranc\u00ebn p\u00ebr mos-zbatimin e vendimit t\u00eb saj<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Terminologjia, por sidomos tempi i gjuh\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb vendimit, ngjan me nj\u00eb \u201cfshikullim\u00eb\u201d t\u00eb fort\u00eb q\u00eb Gjykata Kushtetuese i jep Kuvendit, m\u00eb sakt\u00ebsisht shumic\u00ebs socialiste q\u00eb rr\u00ebzoi me vot\u00eb vendimin e saj t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n

Por, a \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb \u201cfshikullim\u00eb\u201d e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese ndaj maxhoranc\u00ebs s\u00eb Edi Ram\u00ebs, aq m\u00eb tep\u00ebr kur kjo trup\u00eb gjykuese ka treguar thuajse p\u00ebrher\u00eb se sh\u00ebrben si nj\u00eb zgjatim i pushtetit t\u00eb kryeministrit?<\/p>\n

Shohim disa detaje t\u00eb tjera, p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar m\u00eb mir\u00eb se ajo q\u00eb ngjan si \u201cfshikullim\u00eb\u201d, n\u00eb fakt duket m\u00eb shum\u00eb nj\u00eb loj\u00eb e holl\u00eb proceduriale, p\u00ebr t\u00eb shp\u00ebtuar s\u00ebrish mandatin e Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Loja \u201cfine\u201d e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gjykata Kushtetuese kishte mund\u00ebsin\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb shqyrtonte drejt\u00ebp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb deputetes socialiste n\u00eb baz\u00eb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve.<\/p>\n

Por, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb shum\u00eb fine, u shmang nga shqyrtimi i k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkese, duke treguar s\u00ebrish se nuk ka as guximin m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl p\u00ebr t\u2019u p\u00ebrballur me njer\u00ebzit e oborrit t\u00eb Edi Ram\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb sqarimi mbi k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e 1\/10 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve, pra ai q\u00eb lidhej me \u201ckeqardhjen\u201d e Gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr refuzimin e Parlamentit shtrihet gjer\u00ebsisht n\u00eb shum\u00eb faqe t\u00eb vendimit, q\u00ebndrimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve, aty ku mund t\u00eb vendosej fati i mandatit t\u00eb Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs, \u00ebsht\u00eb i shprehur vet\u00ebm n\u00eb dy paragraf\u00eb.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Gjykata Kushtetuese \u201cinjoron\u201d k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

N\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhur, k\u00ebta paragraf\u00eb shprehen me fjalin\u00eb:\u00a0\u201c\u2026.Gjykata vler\u00ebson t\u00eb mos ndalet n\u00eb analizimin e kritereve paraprake dhe themelin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes<\/em>\u201d, pasi m\u00eb par\u00eb kishte arritur n\u00eb konkluzionin se duhet t\u00eb ri-detyronte Parlamentin t\u2019i sillte rastin e Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs p\u00ebr shqyrtim.<\/p>\n

Gjykata shkakton kriz\u00eb kushtetuese<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kushtetuta dhe ligji organik i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese e njohin 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve si nj\u00eb prej subjekteve q\u00eb mund t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje gjykat\u00ebn n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pakufizuar.<\/p>\n

Pra, 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve mund t\u2019i drejtohen Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb kushtetutshm\u00ebris\u00eb ose edhe p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje me interes konkret.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb praktik\u00ebn shum\u00eb-vje\u00e7are t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, ky pa-kufizim i 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb pranuar gjer\u00ebsisht dhe trupat gjykuese kan\u00eb shqyrtuar vite m\u00eb par\u00eb k\u00ebrkesa t\u00eb k\u00ebtij subjekti, si t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme, ashtu edhe p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje me interes konkret.<\/p>\n

Por, megjith\u00ebse nuk ka asnj\u00eb ndryshim n\u00eb Kushtetut\u00eb apo ligj p\u00ebr t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e pakufizuar t\u00eb 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve, trupa gjyq\u00ebsore e krijuar pas \u201cReform\u00ebs n\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsi\u201d ka treguar nj\u00eb qasje shum\u00eb m\u00eb ndryshe, shum\u00eb m\u00eb kufizuese. Dhe, p\u00ebr rast\u00ebsi, kjo qasje \u201ckufizuese\u201d lidhet sidomos me rastin e Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb vendimin e par\u00eb q\u00eb lidhej me mandatin e deputetes socialiste, t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb Shkurt 2023, Gjykata Kushtetuese, megjith\u00ebse e pushoi at\u00eb gjykim, dha intepretimin se 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve mund t\u2019i drejtohej gjykat\u00ebs\u00a0vet\u00ebm<\/u><\/strong>\u00a0p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje me interes konkret.<\/p>\n

Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb vendimin e radh\u00ebs, at\u00eb t\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb Qershor t\u00eb k\u00ebtij viti dhe t\u00eb zbardhur vet\u00ebm pak dit\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb, shumica e trup\u00ebs s\u00eb Kushtetueses e ka injoruar fare subjektin k\u00ebrkues 1\/5, pra, praktikisht, duke ia hequr t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje Gjykat\u00ebn.<\/p>\n

Ky handipak \u00ebsht\u00eb konstatuar nga gjyqtarja n\u00eb pakic\u00eb, Sonila Bejtja.<\/p>\n

\u201cLigji nr. 8577\/2000 i ka parashikuar dy subjekte q\u00eb mund t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje Gjykat\u00ebn p\u00ebr shqyrtimin e papajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb me mandatin t\u00eb deputetit, konkretisht Kuvendin dhe, n\u00eb rast t\u00eb mosveprimit t\u00eb tij, edhe 1\/5-\u00ebn e deputet\u00ebve\u201d,\u00a0<\/em>u rikujtoj ajo koleg\u00ebve t\u00eb saj.<\/em><\/p>\n

N\u00eb vijim, gjyqtarja n\u00eb pakic\u00eb shprehet se \u201carsyetimi i p\u00ebrdorur nga shumica n\u00eb vendim p\u00ebr k\u00ebrkimin e 1\/5-\u00ebs\u00a0ka evituar dh\u00ebnien e nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjeje<\/u><\/strong>\u00a0n\u00eb lidhje me legjitimimin e k\u00ebtij subjekti kushtetues, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb kishte mbajtur q\u00ebndrim t\u00eb arsyetuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim<\/em>\u201d, duke l\u00ebn\u00eb t\u00eb kuptohet se nuk jan\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb argumenta t\u00eb qart\u00eb se p\u00ebrse nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb konsiderat\u00eb k\u00ebrkesa e subjektit \u201c1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve\u201d.<\/p>\n

Sipas saj, ky q\u00ebndrim \u201cp\u00ebrjashtues\u201d i shumic\u00ebs s\u00eb trup\u00ebs gjykuese p\u00ebr \u201c1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve\u201d p\u00ebrb\u00ebn dhe do t\u00eb vijoj\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb nj\u00eb arsye t\u00eb fort\u00eb p\u00ebr kriz\u00eb kushtetuese, pasi po i heq n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb paligjshme t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn k\u00ebtij subjekti p\u00ebr t\u2019iu drejtuar Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Q\u00ebndrimi i gjyqtares n\u00eb pakic\u00eb<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cMungesa e nj\u00eb arsyetimi t\u00eb shumic\u00ebs n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim (pra, heqja e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesit 1\/5 e deputet\u00ebve, sh\u00ebn.red) dhe mosdh\u00ebnia p\u00ebrgjigje n\u00eb thelb t\u00eb k\u00ebrkimit t\u00eb 1\/5-\u00ebs s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve n\u00eb lidhje me papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e mandatit t\u00eb deputetes Olta Xha\u00e7ka do t\u00eb krijonte nj\u00eb impass t\u00eb till\u00eb, i cili do t\u00eb p\u00ebrkthehej n\u00eb nj\u00eb kriz\u00eb kushtetuese\u201d<\/em>, shprehet gjyqtarja n\u00eb pakic\u00eb, Bejtja, e cila votoi n\u00eb favor t\u00eb pranimit t\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb 1\/5 s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve.<\/em><\/p>\n

Pik\u00ebrisht, kjo p\u00ebrplasje n\u00eb q\u00ebndrimeve mes an\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb trup\u00ebs mund t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbej\u00eb si nj\u00eb indikator i mir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar se ai \u201cfshikullimi\u201d n\u00eb dukje q\u00eb Kushtetuesja i b\u00ebri maxhoranc\u00ebs, n\u00eb fakt nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr ve\u00e7se nj\u00eb mbules\u00eb e bukur, me t\u00eb cil\u00ebn shumica e gjyqtar\u00ebve kushtetues fshehin q\u00ebllimin e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb-mbrojtjen e mandatit t\u00eb Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs, rrjedhimisht edhe t\u00eb pushtetit t\u00eb Edi Ram\u00ebs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nga\u00a0Boldnews.al N\u00eb nj\u00eb rast thuajse t\u00eb paprecedent, n\u00eb vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese p\u00ebr mandatin e Olta Xha\u00e7k\u00ebs, pranohet t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn dy her\u00eb se kjo \u00e7\u00ebshtje ka nxitur \u201ckriz\u00eb kushtetuese\u201d. Shumica e trup\u00ebs gjykuese vler\u00ebson se refuzimi i shumic\u00ebs parlamentare socialiste p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbatuar nj\u00eb vendim t\u00eb m\u00ebparsh\u00ebm t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, ku detyrohej Parlamenti t\u00eb d\u00ebrgonte …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":86019,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86018\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/86019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}