N\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri, p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb tret\u00eb, vota e deputet\u00ebve socialist\u00eb pengon kalimin n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb ish Ministres s\u00eb Jashtme Olta Xha\u00e7ka.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb ndryshim nga dy rastet e m\u00ebparshme, socialist\u00ebt zgjodh\u00ebn pas mesnat\u00ebs t\u00eb s\u00eb enjtes, q\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb her\u00eb t\u00eb abstenonin n\u00eb shumic\u00eb (65 vota) dhe vet\u00ebm 9 u shpreh\u00ebn kund\u00ebr.<\/p>\n
Vet\u00ebm 25 votat e deputet\u00ebve t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs t\u00eb cilat ishin n\u00eb favor, nuk mund t\u00eb b\u00ebnin asgj\u00eb. P\u00ebrfundimi mbeti i njejt\u00eb, pavar\u00ebsisht se sipas kryetares s\u00eb Gjyat\u00ebs Kushtetuese Holta Za\u00e7aj \u201caskush nuk mund t\u00eb vendos\u00eb t\u00eb mos ekzekutoj\u00eb vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese. Fuqia e vendimeve t\u00eb saj \u00ebsht\u00eb e barabart\u00eb me fuqin\u00eb e ligjit. T\u00eb mos zbatosh vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, do t\u00eb thot\u00eb t\u00eb mos zbatosh Kushtetut\u00ebn dhe ligjin<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n Rasti i mandatit t\u00eb deputetes Xha\u00e7ka e ka zanafill\u00ebn q\u00eb n\u00eb qershor t\u00eb vitit 2022, kur 14 deputet\u00eb demokrat\u00eb, iu drejtuan parlamentit me nj\u00eb mocion p\u00ebr konstatimin e pavlefshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe p\u00ebrfundimin e mandatit t\u00eb ish ministres.<\/p>\n Paralelisht, disa dit\u00eb m\u00eb von\u00eb nj\u00eb mocion i ngjash\u00ebm u paraqit dhe nga nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr grup deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs. Sipas tyre zonja Xha\u00e7ka ishte n\u00eb konflikt interesi, duke qen\u00eb se bashk\u00ebshorti i saj, ish deputeti socialist Artan Ga\u00e7i, kishte p\u00ebrfituar statusin e investitorit strategjik p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrtimin e nj\u00eb hoteli n\u00eb bregdetin e Dh\u00ebrmiut.<\/p>\n Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb vet\u00eb zonja Xha\u00e7ka ka k\u00ebmb\u00ebngulur se ajo nuk ka p\u00ebrfituar asnj\u00eb qindark\u00eb nga fondet publike, dhe se statusi q\u00eb ka p\u00ebrfituar bashk\u00ebshorti i saj nuk parashikon q\u00eb di\u00e7ka e till\u00eb t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb.<\/p>\n N\u00eb at\u00eb koh\u00eb, socialist\u00ebt vler\u00ebsuan se nuk plot\u00ebsoheshin kriteret p\u00ebr d\u00ebrgimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese. N\u00eb n\u00ebntor 2022, ata votuan kund\u00ebr mocionit t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs, e cila menj\u00ebher\u00eb m\u00eb pas iu drejtua Gjykat\u00ebs.<\/p>\n Kjo e fundit u p\u00ebrball me dy k\u00ebrkesa, nj\u00ebra nga 1 e dhjeta e deputet\u00ebve, p\u00ebr zgjidhjen e mosmarr\u00ebveshjes s\u00eb kompetencave mes tyre dhe parlamentit dhe shfuqizimin e vendimit t\u00eb marr\u00eb prej tij, dhe tjetra, nga 1 e pesta e deputet\u00ebve q\u00eb p\u00ebrve\u00e7 shfuqizimit t\u00eb vendimit, k\u00ebrkonte konstatimin e papajtueshm\u00ebris\u00eb n\u00eb ushtrimin e mandatit, pra shqyrtimin prej saj, direkt t\u00eb rastit.<\/p>\n Gjykata i kaloi t\u00eb dyja k\u00ebrkesat n\u00eb seanc\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore, por n\u00eb fund, n\u00eb janar t\u00eb vitit 2023, i dha t\u00eb drejt\u00eb 1 t\u00eb dhjet\u00ebs s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve duke rr\u00ebzuar vendimin e parlamentit dhe duke vler\u00ebsuar se \u00e7\u00ebshtja duhej trajtuar prej saj dhe jo nga parlamenti, i cili sipas Kushtetueses, duhet t\u00eb kishte pranuar mocionin e opozit\u00ebs. Nd\u00ebrsa k\u00ebrkesa e 1 t\u00eb pest\u00ebs s\u00eb deputet\u00ebve u pushua.<\/p>\n P\u00ebr m\u00eb shum\u00eb se 1 vit, rasti u mbajt zvarr\u00eb nga parlamenti, dhe vet\u00ebm n\u00eb prill 2024, kaloi s\u00ebrish n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare, ku 72 votat kund\u00ebr t\u00eb shumic\u00ebs, bllokuan s\u00ebrish d\u00ebrgimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese.<\/p>\n Socialist\u00ebt iu referuan p\u00ebrcaktimit ligjor se \u201cparlamenti vendos\u201d dhe se vendimet merren me vot\u00eb, e deputet\u00ebt jan\u00eb t\u00eb lir\u00eb p\u00ebr m\u00ebnr\u00ebn se si votojn\u00eb, dhe se kjo p\u00ebrcaktohet n\u00eb Kushtetut\u00eb ku thuhet se mandati i tyre nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb detyrues.<\/p>\n Opozita e cil\u00ebsoi q\u00ebndrimin e socialist\u00ebve nj\u00eb \u201cpu\u00e7 kushtetues\u201d dhe iu drejtuan s\u00ebrish gjykat\u00ebs, e cila n\u00eb korrik t\u00eb k\u00ebtij viti shfuqizoi s\u00ebrish vendimin e parlamentit, duke k\u00ebrkuar s\u00ebrish nga parlamenti q\u00eb rasti t\u2019i p\u00ebrcillej asaj.<\/p>\n Kryetarja Za\u00e7aj tha se: \u201cdeputet\u00ebt duhet t\u00eb votojn\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me urdh\u00ebrimin e Gjykat\u00ebs, pasi ky votim nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb e zakonshme parlamentare dhe si e till\u00eb nuk ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me parimin e mandatit jodetyrues t\u00eb deputetit, por \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb ekzekutimit t\u00eb vendimit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n Mbetet e paqart\u00eb se si do t\u00eb veprohet m\u00eb tej, dhe n\u00ebse deputet\u00ebt e opozit\u00ebs do t\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb s\u00ebrish nd\u00ebrhyrjen e Gjykat\u00ebs e cila praktikisht \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrplasje t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt\u00eb me parlamentin.<\/p>\n Kryetarja Elisa Spiropali, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuese e shumic\u00ebs socialiste, u shpreh pas votimit se do t\u2019i dretohej menj\u00ebher\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Venecias, p\u00ebr t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb interpretim t\u00eb situat\u00ebs, e cila si asnj\u00ebher\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb, ka v\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebrball\u00eb dy nga institucionet m\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme t\u00eb vendit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" N\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri, p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb tret\u00eb, vota e deputet\u00ebve socialist\u00eb pengon kalimin n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes s\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb ish Ministres s\u00eb Jashtme Olta Xha\u00e7ka. N\u00eb ndryshim nga dy rastet e m\u00ebparshme, socialist\u00ebt zgjodh\u00ebn pas mesnat\u00ebs t\u00eb s\u00eb enjtes, q\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb her\u00eb t\u00eb abstenonin n\u00eb shumic\u00eb (65 vota) dhe vet\u00ebm 9 u shpreh\u00ebn kund\u00ebr. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":74587,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-politike"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88989\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rdnews.al\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}